ice445
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2020
- Threads
- 38
- Messages
- 6,818
- Reaction score
- 8,258
- Location
- Salt Lake City, UT
- First Name
- Ryan
- Vehicle(s)
- 2020 Mustang GT 6MT
Sure, at the cost of loss of control. Most of the improvements that the ECU gets from having direct control of the throttle relate to emissions. Not being able to close the throttle manually because there's unburned fuel in the intake frankly sucks.I'm genuinely curious why. On a theoretical level, these systems should be simpler and better than what we currently have today, and there are mechanical failsafe integrated for safety.
After all, we already have electronic throttle bodies that vastly improved what the ECU can do to better control the engine management strategy, why not apply the same concept to the brakes?
Did you try out any car with brake by wire and didn't like it?
I just really dislike the idea of pressing a fake pedal and having the computer brake for me. It feels illogical, alien even. Sure, on other modern cars the ABS module can essentially interrupt what you're doing if it feels you're going to lock up the wheels, but at least my foot is actually creating hydraulic pressure in the system, and I get that little bit of feedback. In a sea of electrically controlled vehicles, that's about where I draw the line.
In actual practice? It works fine, although I haven't driven a QV, I have driven a regular 2.0 car. It's alright I guess, so it's more a matter of principle. One of the reasons I stick to manual transmissions.
Sponsored