Fissy
Member
That's still an insane dyno for 17 phase 2. I was nowhere near that and I'm Lund tuned. Maybe I need to hit up a different dyno or maybe mine was more heat soaked than I thought (105 degree with humidity here in Houston)
Sponsored
Going by what the owner told me. He did have headers and other mods, but very possible he was quoting crank numbers as WHP.How does a 16 GT with roush SC have 740rwhp on 93? That doesn't sound even remotely close to correct. My 16 with roush phase 2 SC just dynod nearly 150rwhp less than that. Are you sure he didn't have the phase 2 sc thats rated for 740 at the crank?
Yeah it's hard to get to 700 on 93 but if his trap speed is 131 then I'd say he is very close to 700.Going by what the owner told me. He did have headers and other mods, but very possible he was quoting crank numbers as WHP.
Sc adds about 200lbs to your car and without a good fresh tire and suspension work you might as well be stock. Very good time. Don't think you'll have any trouble getting into the 10'sSounds about right. Either way, I'm very impressed with my tune only car to be just 2 tenths behind him. I'm about 460 WHP.
The 16 GT had 305/45/17 DR's, and I was on 19" DR's. He still had an advantage.Sc adds about 200lbs to your car and without a good fresh tire and suspension work you might as well be stock. Very good time. Don't think you'll have any trouble getting into the 10's