Huh? All the cars were racing in the same cold weather, meaning they were all handicapped by the same conditions at the same time. Hardly the same as racing one car with cooked tires vs one that doesn’t have cooked tires. Furthermore, they replicated the same exact results from the runs on their test track with the same cars.
But the difference is that I only spew facts.
You mean cooked like these rear tires?
i must say. That is a nice picture.You mean cooked like these rear tires?
So it doesnt matter when the guys at edmunds say that they cant get traction and that the camaro tires are affected more than the others, but it does matter on the other tests that the mustang tires are "cooked"?
You mean cooked like these rear tires?
So it doesnt matter when the guys at edmunds say that they cant get traction and that the camaro tires are affected more than the others, but it does matter on the other tests that the mustang tires are "cooked"?
The rear tires on that car are not sport cup 2'You mean cooked like these rear tires?
So it doesnt matter when the guys at edmunds say that they cant get traction and that the camaro tires are affected more than the others, but it does matter on the other tests that the mustang tires are "cooked"?
The rear tires on the car pictured are Goodyear Supercar 3R's they look like that brand new, they are essentially slicks. Since they had at least two camaros in this video are we sure this is the actual car that set the lap time? Again horrible test set up for BOTH cars.You mean cooked like these rear tires?
So it doesnt matter when the guys at edmunds say that they cant get traction and that the camaro tires are affected more than the others, but it does matter on the other tests that the mustang tires are "cooked"?
Yes, I hope people with zero experience and/or clue stop posting pics and carping about, "See! See! This blurry photo, of a tire I have no clue about means something-something! Quack quack quack!"
These are the tires specced for ZLE and GT500 as they would look new on the vehicle. What I find interesting is that the tread depth on the GY is 5/32" and the tread depth of the Cup 2 is 7/32", yet, people's experiences with the two tires is that the Cup 2 wears faster.
Its not wear, after a track day they get hard and just dont grip that much, at least thats my experience with them.These are the tires specced for ZLE and GT500 as they would look new on the vehicle. What I find interesting is that the tread depth on the GY is 5/32" and the tread depth of the Cup 2 is 7/32", yet, people's experiences with the two tires is that the Cup 2 wears faster.
No they didnt, mention that on the video, just like they didnt mention that the gray zl1 1le ran the gt500 3 times and won on all of them.
You cannot be serious? Randy nor anyone else in that test mentioned the zl1 tires being cooked. They did however, be sure to state the 500 tires were cooked and even went on to say the 500 would have beat it around the track with fresh tires. You must be trolling.
Depends on the camber adjustment. If you go too far negative you won't get as much chocolate to the pavement.This is a donut:
It looks like a tire and is sticky, so I'm assuming it would produce better lap times ... if not, I would suspect it would taste better than a tire.
the Cup2 compound goes off faster. It may also shed rubber but that is not the issue under discussion. That pic is utterly useless from a standpoint of asserting anything aside from the tires are black and round, and they rolled the cars thru a dusty area before taking the picture.
Not sure we can compete with the conspiracy theorists here who say Randy Pobst sandbags the lap times for Ford products.