Sponsored

Suspension mods to plant the car at higher speeds

TheReaper

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Threads
5
Messages
553
Reaction score
285
Location
Mobile Al
First Name
Jesse
Vehicle(s)
2018 Shadow Black GT
OK, I apologize if I came up a little trollish, definitely not intended. I have a sense of humor that I forget some people don't like too much.

Turning humor knob down...
It's either springs or tires. My 14 GT stays well planted at 150 on stock suspension so I would expect the s550 do be even better.
Sponsored

 

Performance nut

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2015
Threads
178
Messages
1,667
Reaction score
626
Location
TX
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT A10
Vehicle Showcase
1
It's either springs or tires. My 14 GT stays well planted at 150 on stock suspension so I would expect the s550 do be even better.
Maybe the S550 is different. I got the same feeling when I opened mine up, like it was "floating" and mine was stock at that time. Last time I had that feeling on another car, it was damping that solved it for me (not enough of it).

Aerodynamics as in components that create downforce on the car, may also be considered. Not saying it is needed, just something to consider if you plan on going hella fast (more than what a stock S550 can take you). Usually you have to get going pretty damn fast to generate sufficient downforce (unless you have a really aggressive setting). The rest of the time, it just causes you to have crappy fuel efficiency.
 

EFI

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 19, 2015
Threads
62
Messages
4,818
Reaction score
4,132
Location
Masshole central
Vehicle(s)
5.Br0
100+ is pretty high to me.

Have you ever been in an airboat? It feels very little like that. When you turn the steering a little is not very responsive, like there is a tiny delay. Hard to explain, the car feels more like it is floating rather than on rails like I want it.

I come from a G37s and that car was planted at all times, it gave me a lot of confidence to drive it at high speeds. The Mustang feels like at any moment I could lose control. Kind of like driving a big Pickup truck at high speeds. Not nice at all and the Mustang isn't nearly as heavy as PU. I would like to fix this issue.
Have you actually lost control or seen any specific issues with the high speed handling? It seems you "feel" the car is like that but you don't have any actual examples. And just basing this on "feel" is a poor way to do it. You may feel like it's about to come loose, but in reality it's not.

I can't imagine that a G37 feels like it's on rails but a GTPP feels loose (unless the G37 was modded extensively). I had a 2012 G37 Sport and it does not even come close to the handling and stability of the GT I have currently. Makes me think your feel meter is off and that's why I asked if you had any actual experience rather than just feel.

If everything checks out, as in you don't have any damaged suspension parts, I would say it's mostly in your head.
 

avocet

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 25, 2015
Threads
30
Messages
1,308
Reaction score
351
Location
Kent, England
First Name
Ted
Vehicle(s)
Mustang GT
Vehicle Showcase
1
I've had similar, but I had adjustable shocks set too soft.
When loaded up, and with passenger, the ride at speed (100)
Felt unstable, floating ( at the front) I was making minute adjustments on steering wheel as I was driving to keep it straight.I adjusted my suspension stiffer, fitted steeda sway bars,now it feels safe and I have the confidence to open her up.I think because they were set soft, if you had extra weight in the car,it made it light in the front, making it feel loose.
 

jbailer

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 1, 2015
Threads
43
Messages
3,273
Reaction score
1,291
Location
Maryland
First Name
Joe
Vehicle(s)
2015 EB Magnetic Premium PP 50AP
Have you tried clocking the bushings? If you didn't have a problem before the springs were installed and you're confident in the alignment, this is the only thing I can think of.
 

Sponsored

G-Rell

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2016
Threads
7
Messages
134
Reaction score
54
Location
KC
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT Premium
I just did sportlines this weekend... been fine to 80 (without the alignment). It handles differently for sure... but no "floating"
 
OP
OP

fcarpio

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Threads
23
Messages
170
Reaction score
18
Location
South Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Have you actually lost control or seen any specific issues with the high speed handling? It seems you "feel" the car is like that but you don't have any actual examples. And just basing this on "feel" is a poor way to do it. You may feel like it's about to come loose, but in reality it's not.

I can't imagine that a G37 feels like it's on rails but a GTPP feels loose (unless the G37 was modded extensively). I had a 2012 G37 Sport and it does not even come close to the handling and stability of the GT I have currently. Makes me think your feel meter is off and that's why I asked if you had any actual experience rather than just feel.

If everything checks out, as in you don't have any damaged suspension parts, I would say it's mostly in your head.
There is another thread I created for a similar issue. The car actually lets loose when accelerating and changing lanes. I have to correct to not spin out. Like I mentioned earlier, the new springs (eiback sportlines) made it worse. I'll keep reading here and try the things that some of you have already suggested.
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
15,010
Reaction score
8,921
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
There is another thread I created for a similar issue. The car actually lets loose when accelerating and changing lanes. I have to correct to not spin out. Like I mentioned earlier, the new springs (eiback sportlines) made it worse. I'll keep reading here and try the things that some of you have already suggested.
Well, you put springs on that are far higher rate than your stock ones and put the car's geometry way out of whack compared to stock. So, lack of weight transfer control and possibly poor contact patch and suspension geometry.
 
OP
OP

fcarpio

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Threads
23
Messages
170
Reaction score
18
Location
South Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Have you tried clocking the bushings? If you didn't have a problem before the springs were installed and you're confident in the alignment, this is the only thing I can think of.
did not do that and they mention the floating feeling. This is validation for me, now I know I am not imagining things...
 
OP
OP

fcarpio

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Threads
23
Messages
170
Reaction score
18
Location
South Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
I just did sportlines this weekend... been fine to 80 (without the alignment). It handles differently for sure... but no "floating"
Take it up to 100 and SAFELY change lanes. Let me know how it goes.
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

fcarpio

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Threads
23
Messages
170
Reaction score
18
Location
South Florida
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Well, you put springs on that are far higher rate than your stock ones and put the car's geometry way out of whack compared to stock. So, lack of weight transfer control and possibly poor contact patch and suspension geometry.
Yep, I did it!
 

s550v6

Mike
Joined
Aug 16, 2015
Threads
21
Messages
341
Reaction score
63
Location
Long Island
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2015 mustang V6
The symptom I am trying to fix is the feel of instability at higher speeds. The car does not give me confidence at all. The only suspension mods so far are Eibach SportLine springs. The car felt much better before the springs. At high speeds it feels as it sways a little from side to side. It does not feel stable at all. I have been told that this is just the way the car is, but that is not good enough.

What can I do to make the car feel more stable?
You may need to do shocks and struts to get the feeling youre looking for. I did BMR's SP080 springs and Steeda's pro action fixed shocks/sturts and my car feels planted at 125+ on less than ideal surfaces. Clocking the bushings helped with the bounce a little but also adding spherical bearings where the struts and shocks meet the car made a huge difference in stability. BMR's CP001 caster camber plates and Steedas billet rear shock mounts went on at the same time, but after the whole suspension went in, and they made a very noticeable difference in just how stable the car feels. Its way more planted than floating over the road on pillows-for-bushings.
 

Bluemustang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Threads
149
Messages
3,897
Reaction score
2,264
Location
Maryland
First Name
Ryan
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Base GT
Well, you put springs on that are far higher rate than your stock ones and put the car's geometry way out of whack compared to stock. So, lack of weight transfer control and possibly poor contact patch and suspension geometry.

[MENTION=10281]BmacIL[/MENTION] - I know that front suspension geometry is "fixable" in terms of caster / camber plates and bumpsteer kit if necessary, but I assume the rear geometry is not changeable (other than camber) without significant chassis modifications. Is that right? So in other words, if you lower the rear too much you will get a lot of geometry change?
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
15,010
Reaction score
8,921
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
[MENTION=10281]BmacIL[/MENTION] - I know that front suspension geometry is "fixable" in terms of caster / camber plates and bumpsteer kit if necessary, but I assume the rear geometry is not changeable (other than camber) without significant chassis modifications. Is that right? So in other words, if you lower the rear too much you will get a lot of geometry change?
Yes the roll and pitch centers, camber gain, plus bump steer all change with lowering. The motion ratio is also not a straight line and changes some with displacement. I'd personally not go significantly further than 0.5" in the rear based on my conversations with those in the know.

This is on a performance basis alone and not factoring in looks, which is a big reason many springs are 1" drop.
 

Bluemustang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2015
Threads
149
Messages
3,897
Reaction score
2,264
Location
Maryland
First Name
Ryan
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang Base GT
Yes the roll and pitch centers, camber gain, plus bump steer all change with lowering. The motion ratio is also not a straight line and changes some with displacement. I'd personally not go significantly further than 0.5" in the rear based on my conversations with those in the know.

This is on a performance basis alone and not factoring in looks, which is a big reason many springs are 1" drop.
I wonder why Ford Racing would engineer their track package to lower the car and inch on all 4 corners when the bumpsteer is already bad in this car, and the lowered ride height increases both camber and caster. The Mustang came with a caster of 7. Mine is about nearing 8 possibly more now that I'm lowered.

I read on Steeda's website - they say that most race cars have a caster of 6 to 8 and the Mustang comes from the factory with a caster of 7. They noted that if you go over 8 on the caster that it will put the camber out of its good range. I assume they mean dynamic camber, or the additional lean during cornering?

What irks me is that companies claim to sell you on lowering springs and similar items which will give you "race-car like handling" but they fail to mention that it messes up the geometry of the car and they don't include anything to remedy it. So the customer is left with a good looking car that can't handle for shit and is all over the road because of bumpsteer and alignment is off.

The average consumer doesn't know these things. I'm not a technical suspension engineer. I can't re-design the Mustang's suspension like I would need to to make a lot of these products actually effective.
Sponsored

 
 




Top