Sponsored

Shelby GT350 Mustang Dynoed (UPDATE: 467 RWHP / 374 LB-FT)

stanglife

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Threads
180
Messages
7,026
Reaction score
5,715
Location
FL
First Name
Jeff
Vehicle(s)
1993 Coyote Coupe
UPDATED WITH DYNO GRAPH OVERLAY COMPARISON WITH 5.0L COYOTE (Courtesy of 65Terdlingua & GT P-TREE):




UPDATED WITH GT350 DYNO RESULTS FROM MOTORTREND:

- 467WHP
- 374lb LB-FT

A flat-plane crank is one of the great mysteries of the world, or so it would seem. It gets its name from its physical appearance, but you’re not going to see the Voodoo engine’s crank any more than you’ll see the regular Mustang GT’s Coyote crankshaft.

What you need to know is that the flat-plane crank changes a V-8’s firing order so that the two banks of cylinders fire at even intervals relative to each other. In other words, as the engine runs, one of the cylinders on the left bank fires, then the right, then the left, and so on.

Conventional V-8s don’t alternate evenly between the banks, so the benefit of a flat-plane crank is all in the way the intake and exhaust manifolds are tuned. Because of the even firing, engineers can construct the manifolds to take advantage of resonances. More air in and more air out means more power.




The 5.2-liter Voodoo revs to 8,200 rpm and makes 526 hp, but its power delivery and sound aren’t like anything you’ve experienced from a Mustang.

So we strapped it to the dyno, thanks to our friends at K&N engineering.

Have a listen.

And now take a look at the results.




The GT350 is rated at 526 hp and 429 lb-ft of torque. Because we’re using a chassis dyno, the output we measure will be less than that, as it takes into account losses in the drivetrain. Additionally, the ambient temperature at the time of the test was more than 100 degrees with only 20 percent relative humidity. Although these are SAE-corrected numbers, we’d expect higher output at lower temperatures.

GT350 DYNOJET RESULTS:

467 hp (wheel) @ 7,200 rpm
374 lb-ft (wheel) @ 4,900 rpm

The GT350 put down 467 hp and 374 lb-ft to the wheels. Given the ambient temperature especially, that’s a very healthy result.

As always, peak numbers are just one set of data points. It’s the shape of the curve that matters. Notice that at very low revs, the V-8 struggles to make torque. At 1,500 rpm, it’s producing just 238 lb-ft—not a lot for a big-displacement, long-stroke V-8. In real-world driving, that output is accompanied by occasional stumbles; it’s clear the engine isn’t happy at low revs. Torque builds slowly, however, until 3,250, when something big happens.

Very big. From 3,250 to 3,750 rpm, torque output jumps by a huge 27 percent. And from there to about 6,250 rpm, it’s essentially a huge plateau of peak torque with a few bulges likely caused by resonances in the intake system. Even then, torque starts to fall only slowly all the way to the fuel cut. Ford quotes that as happening at 8,250, but our GT350 cut fuel earlier—8,200 rpm was the highest we saw, and even that only occasionally. Our best run made it only to 8,050 rpm before the limiter kicked in.

The GT350’s horsepower peak occurs at 7,200 rpm on the dyno, almost 1,000 revs short of the limiter, but output stays at or near that peak number almost that entire way, dropping by less than 10 hp at the 8,050-rpm limiter.

If Ford had limited the Voodoo to 7,200 rpm, it would have put down the same peak number on the dyno, but you’d miss out on that last, glorious 1,000 rpm of pull, where the 5.2-liter V-8 is all but maintaining that peak.

See the dangers of just looking at the peak number?

In sum, this is a beautiful example of an engine that loves to rev. The kick in

the pants you get around 3,500 rpm is exhilarating, and the fact that this engine pulls so hard all the way past 8,000 rpm makes it an absolute riot to run to redline.

http://wot.motortrend.com/hear-the-shelby-gt350s-flat-plane-crank-v-8-on-the-dyno.html
I believe it's been dyno'd. He seems to work for K&N and they had the GT350R and Z28 there. Says it was dyno'd today. I've asked him on his post about the numbers so please don't everyone hammer him.

https://instagram.com/p/8mGPmWqD9a
Sponsored

 
OP
OP
stanglife

stanglife

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Threads
180
Messages
7,026
Reaction score
5,715
Location
FL
First Name
Jeff
Vehicle(s)
1993 Coyote Coupe

chill66

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
704
Reaction score
577
Location
Reno, NV
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2020 Twister Orange GT500
463


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
24
Reaction score
103
Location
VA Beach
Vehicle(s)
08GT, 13GT, 16GT350
The guy in the link say Motor Trend will release the numbers.

Does anybody have any friends that work for that magazine?
 

Sponsored

pete613

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2015
Threads
1
Messages
91
Reaction score
71
Location
NJ
Vehicle(s)
2016 Shelby GT350R
After what he wrote as the caption, think it could maybe break 500 at the wheels? Wishful thinking, I know...
 
OP
OP
stanglife

stanglife

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Threads
180
Messages
7,026
Reaction score
5,715
Location
FL
First Name
Jeff
Vehicle(s)
1993 Coyote Coupe
After what he wrote as the caption, think it could maybe break 500 at the wheels? Wishful thinking, I know...
No, it's been certified at 526 - drivetrain loss will be more than 26.
 

likeaboss

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2013
Threads
42
Messages
2,412
Reaction score
983
Location
Baltimore, MD
Vehicle(s)
2020 Corvette Z51
That K&N dyno is known to run high given the results in previous Mustang reviews.
 

Bossing

attacks tracks
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Threads
29
Messages
3,524
Reaction score
3,144
Location
So. FL
Vehicle(s)
Just can't get enuff!
474hp
 

Blk2015GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Threads
16
Messages
2,847
Reaction score
755
Location
.
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
480ish

Drivetrain loss on a good manual is only a few percent; so it should be around 470-480
 

Sponsored

chill66

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
704
Reaction score
577
Location
Reno, NV
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2020 Twister Orange GT500
15% loss is 447hp.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Blk2015GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Threads
16
Messages
2,847
Reaction score
755
Location
.
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT
15% loss is 447hp.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Edited it after doing the math. Few mustangs are seeing 15% losses even in the GT- that's just the general rule. 15% would be dynoing stock at 370. People are easily seeing 380-390 on the 5.0 which is only 10-12% loss

I can only assume the trans on the 350 is more efficient like everything else.

I'm sticking by 475-480.
 

chill66

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2014
Threads
3
Messages
704
Reaction score
577
Location
Reno, NV
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2020 Twister Orange GT500
Yeah, I'm thinking 12% loss, so I guessed 463hp. Hoping for 10% or less! ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

bluebeastsrt

Oh boy
Joined
May 10, 2015
Threads
79
Messages
7,552
Reaction score
7,027
Location
New Jersey
First Name
BigD
Vehicle(s)
Ruby red 2019 GT Premium.
Yeah, I'm thinking 12% loss, so I guessed 463hp. Hoping for 10% or less! ;)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
12% is a realistic number for a manual.
Sponsored

 
 




Top