sk47
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2020
- Threads
- 27
- Messages
- 5,038
- Reaction score
- 2,395
- Location
- North Eastern TN
- First Name
- Jeff
- Vehicle(s)
- Chevy Silverado & Nissan Sentra SE
Hello; Interesting take on the exemption. The testing is part of the process even if not the specific mRNA production. So still a part of the overall process.Except the Holy See says it isn't an issue. None of the mRNA vaccines use human tissue in the manufacture or production. They tested the vaccines on the cells (only two lines exist which date back to the 70's and 80's) when they were doing their due diligence in assuring they are safe.
Also, many other vaccines are tested this way...Hep C, varicella, etc.
One more thing, do those that object work for health care orgs that prescribe birth control and/or perform abortions? I bet most of them do. This is obviously an attempt to abuse the religious exemption.
If a person has strong beliefs about the use of live animals in the testing of cosmetics for safety, say putting a cosmetic into the eyes of rabbits. Then that person would have reason to not want to use the cosmetic even if a live animal is not used in the making of the cosmetic.
This is obviously an attempt to undermine the religious exemption.
Sponsored