Norm Peterson
corner barstool sitter
I'm not so sure about that last. As you move weight distribution rearward by moving front weight all the way to the rear, you're increasing PMOI. Which in turn decreases yaw response (think turn-in, steering response, and "nimbleness"). Putting the big masses at the two ends is a good tool for keeping a very lightweight car from being too twitchy, but you could take 500 lbs out of a Mustang and it still wouldn't be anywhere near "very lightweight".A corvette does have a similar package. However, it uses a modular transmission (Tremec 6070) which sits forward of the rear track, sandwiched between the coupler and the rear differential which is directly in line with axis of the rear wheels. It lacks the direct drive accesories describes in my concept entirely. A true transaxle can be inverted so that the gearbox actually sits behind the differential gearing, pushing 120lbs back another 16 inches or so and saving ~15 lbs of cast casing material from the integration of the assemblies. Factor in the displacement of roughly 100 lbs of accessories and battery behind the rear wheels and your bias is probably moving beyond 50/50. An extra 200lbs over the rear wheels would do wonders for rear traction, as well as overall handling characteristics.
Pretty sure I'd rather start with a 52/48 car with lower PMOI than a 50/50 car with a higher PMOI. Dyed-in-the-wool drag race fans would likely choose differently.
Norm
Sponsored