Sponsored

Reading that the DCT TCM is finally fully cracked

engineermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Threads
22
Messages
5,232
Reaction score
4,872
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10
I don't see this in practice. There is a time when acceleration is reduced during the shift.
In characters 0 and 1, Ford elected to intentionally reduce engine torque during the shifts. Typically, it retards timing to accomplish this. However, as in the case with character 2 (drag mode), it makes full torque through the shift. There is no loss in acceleration.
Sponsored

 

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
116
Messages
12,867
Reaction score
11,404
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
However, as in the case with character 2 (drag mode), it makes full torque through the shift. There is no loss in acceleration.
If this is the case the DCT will be slower.

Would be nice to be able to test this.
 
OP
OP
Angrey

Angrey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Threads
104
Messages
2,760
Reaction score
2,842
Location
Coral Gables
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
I think we should divide this convo into two categories. The 10R80 is useless above a certain power level for gears 7-10.

The highest HP cars running it are essentially gearing the differential to create a 6 speed and the other 4 gears are simply cruising gears treated like overdrive.

Something about the particular combination and sized of engaged guts/internals makes 7th and up weak. Not really an issue for moderate or meager builds.

Truthfully it seems like we've not seen the torque limitations of the DCT yet because of the nanny features in the TCM, but even with those builds that seem to trick the TCM as a workaround, we've seen pretty big HP cars run the DCT with zero internal upgrades and it's largely stood up to the task (at least we don't see many failures posted).

The 10R80 is obviously much more finnicky when it comes to temperature range. Shift quality and reliability is affected if you try to run it out of a fairly narrow temp band. Now, that's resolvable with a cooler and proper logic, but I'm not sure that's gonna be the case for die hard track builds that are abusing the heat limits around a track at 5k+ rpm for 30 minute sessions.

It remains yet to be seen which one would be more problematic with integrating into previous model/gen dash and controls. Not sure you could do a swap/upgrade to a 10R without the digital dash. Likely/probably a similar case with the DCT as well (or live with wrench lights and stuff like cruise control that doesn't work).
 

WildHorse

N/A or GO HOME
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Threads
263
Messages
10,121
Reaction score
8,106
Location
Home World: CLASSIFIED
First Name
Puddintane
Vehicle(s)
'17 S550
Vehicle Showcase
1
If this is the case the DCT will be slower.
Fortunately it's not the case .
Everybody knows STOCK drag mode with the 10R80 is garbage.
 

Sponsored

engineermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Threads
22
Messages
5,232
Reaction score
4,872
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10
the slipping, the flaring, the overly harsh shifts, the almost random TQ lockup.
Drag mode is supposed to be harsh.

As for the rest of it, where are you getting this information? Many commercial tuners and most fast cars use character 2 in all modes and it works fine the way ford programmed it up past 150 in the quarter. It isn’t great at light throttle but that’s not what it was designed for.

If it’s slipping or flaring then the transmission is shot.
 

Andy13186

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2018
Threads
108
Messages
2,499
Reaction score
1,510
Location
Florida
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT 10speed Aluminator Whippled
10R80 avg shift time is .3 seconds 5 shifts is 1.5 seconds, total time lost to shifting

Tr9070 is .08 seconds, 5 shifts is .4 seconds total
lmao if you think thats true, what is your source? 10r80 accelerates harder during shifts than when in gear
 

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
116
Messages
12,867
Reaction score
11,404
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,

mejohn50

Intergalactic Snail
Joined
Jun 12, 2016
Threads
23
Messages
681
Reaction score
724
Location
United States
First Name
Mitch
Vehicle(s)
slow junk
Here’s a snip from a log using shift character 2 (drag mode) in the 1/4 mile on a 10R80. This is from a Whipple cal, but it uses almost entirely OEM shift character data. I lowered the torque modulation on the 1>2 and 2>3 shifts, which is why torque drops on those shifts, but the rest are commanding full torque on the shifts.

Green is RPM and white is engine brake torque.

IMG_4590.jpg
 

Sponsored
OP
OP
Angrey

Angrey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Threads
104
Messages
2,760
Reaction score
2,842
Location
Coral Gables
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
Here’s a snip from a log using shift character 2 (drag mode) in the 1/4 mile on a 10R80. This is from a Whipple cal, but it uses almost entirely OEM shift character data. I lowered the torque modulation on the 1>2 and 2>3 shifts, which is why torque drops on those shifts, but the rest are commanding full torque on the shifts.

Green is RPM and white is engine brake torque.

IMG_4590.jpg
It does seem to support the idea that it's "accelerating" harder (creating more torque) for the shifts from 3-4, 4-5, and 5-6.

Per your comments, you've softened the 1-2 and 2-3 and that's smart, on a big power car the total torque multiplication is probably in the 10,000 ft-lb range on a PD blown car in first gear. Assuming perfect traction those would be the harshest torque shocks to the drive line. However, in reality, in big power cars there's rarely perfect traction so I suppose the 3-4 would be the candidate for harshest loading, as the multiplication is about half and there's sufficient traction to see every bit of the torque applied onto the driveline components.
 

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
116
Messages
12,867
Reaction score
11,404
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
It does seem to support the idea that it's "accelerating" harder (creating more torque) for the shifts from 3-4, 4-5, and 5-6.
The question is, is the on coming clutch slipping?

The engine is supplying the same or more torque, but is it getting to the wheels?
 

engineermike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2018
Threads
22
Messages
5,232
Reaction score
4,872
Location
La
Vehicle(s)
2018 GTPP A10
So I took @mejohn50 's raw data for the 4-5 shift from his posted log and put it on a graph with a stock 2020 GT500 3-4 shift so they can be compared (these shifts were just a few mph apart). It's quite eye opening. Keep in mind this is a stock "drag mode" 10r80 shift vs a stock GT500 DCT shift.

1730740210053-tg.jpg


If you go by the timestamps in the native app (vcmscanner), the 10r80 shift completed in 165 ms, while the DCT shift took 278 ms. It actually looks like the rate of rpm drop is about the same, but the DCT just had more of an rpm drop to deal with, so it took longer at the same rate.

The torque management is a key difference. Since the DCT must release torque for some time period, albeit small, you can not apply full engine torque during a shift. You see the DCT spark timing drop to -18 deg at this time while the 10R80 held timing constant due lack of torque modulation in drag mode. In fact, the total duration of reduced torque in the DCT, including what appears to be 3 stages of it, was surprisingly over half a second(!), though the deepest cut was under 100 ms.
 
Last edited:

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
116
Messages
12,867
Reaction score
11,404
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
Not sure what mode the trans was in on the logs I have but obviously not Drag.
Sponsored

 
 





Top