FreedomPenguin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2018
- Threads
- 34
- Messages
- 604
- Reaction score
- 236
- Location
- Dayton, Ohio
- First Name
- Donald
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 Mustang Ecoboost Premium, 2013 Scion tC.
I agree w clutch spring
Sponsored
At least you have a place to hang your grocery bag from while walking back to your car!
The Mustangs in the showroom at the local dealer have Ford hood struts on 'em. My hood struts are a Ford product (I just had to pay extra). I suspect it's strictly a way to generate licensing fees and aftermarket revenue. Also no way Ford would engineer two different hoods. It's too costly. Since my struts fit in the factory mounting locations, they went in smooth as butta.It's not as simple as making the mod on an aftermarket basis suggests.
Chances are that swapping the prop rod out for struts at the OE level would have caused a redesign of the hood, and from there possibly a recertification effort regarding hood performance in the event of a crash. Which would not be anywhere near a $10 change by the time all is said and done.
Norm
They don't do it because they would lose more sales. Some buyers get analysis paralysis with too many options. Others will walk or delay a purchase when there isn't a car exactly like they want on the lot which is orders of magnitude more likely with just a few more options added. Some of those people end up buying a competitor's product. That's from someone familiar with Ford's decisions regarding this.I just wish Ford would Ă la carte the options.
It also cost more per option when they are seperated. I don't care, I want a la carte.They don't do it because they would lose more sales. Some buyers get analysis paralysis with too many options. Others will walk or delay a purchase when there isn't a car exactly like they want on the lot which is orders of magnitude more likely with just a few more options added. Some of those people end up buying a competitor's product. That's from someone familiar with Ford's decisions regarding this.
Preaching to the choir. But what's good for us is bad for a lot more people. I thought it was great when the order sheets had more boxes than the SATs. like I recall from the '70s And that didn't even count options off the sheet such as any color paint the maker ever offered for less than a few hundred extra.It also cost more per option when they are seperated. I don't care, I want a la carte.
Preaching to the choir. But what's good for us is bad for a lot more people. I thought it was great when the order sheets had more boxes than the SATs. like I recall from the '70s And that didn't even count options off the sheet such as any color paint the maker ever offered for less than a few hundred extra.
I agree with thisI don't see why they can't do both. Offer packages for those who want to keep things simple, and also the option to configure they why you want. If that means production cost would be higher, they could charge a customization fee to allow the buyer to customize.
Our 300C was the same way - every now and then I'd push the lever too far. To me it's just a matter of getting used to the way it works. I'm glad I could change the number of flashes from three to five.Ok, after checking out 13 pages of whinings, it appears I may be the only one who is irritated by the turn signal detent design. On more than one occasion, I've thought I just moved the lever for the 3 cycles, only to discover the next time I look at the gauges, the turn signal is still on like I'm some geriatric in his Buick. I guess the turn signal indicator on the hood was meant for me...should have kept it after '17, or make the "full-on" detent snap like breaking the stem of a champagne flute like GM cars of the 70s and 80s.