BigBlue
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
Disclaimer: No discussion intended her for 2017 or older cars, only for 2018+ since thats what I've found a ton less info on.
In the search for truth and clarity here, wanted to break down what is known and unknown about ported 18 manifolds on ported 18+ manifolds. Too much partial or slightly "cloudy" information going around, as usual with some aftermarket parts not heavily tested on certain applications.
If anyone has real-life reviews of a ported 18+ manifold on a 2018+ GT (auto or stick cars) regarding driveability, and quirks/issues that arose, SoTP differences, and any new dyno data would be good too for the Airflow Solutions (or other porting vendors) in an actual 3rd party situation (not a magazine manifold shootout/etc with engine on an engine dyno outside the car etc), please pipe in and share data. We are assuming the IMRCs are active and in use of course, not locked out like on 15-17's for the swap.
Last info I found in my searches showed a single dyno from a guy with an 18+ with a before/after of just the Airflow Solutions (AFS) ported 18 mani swap for his stock 18 mani. Showed peak 5-6whp and 8-10wtq, with larger torque gains in the lower rpms which i think might be nice for daily punch around town. Seemed much more realistic than the 16-18whp gains claimed on 18+ cars by AFS. This was with longtubes, intake, 93 octane tune, etc.
Notes:
- VMP's shootout comparison is for a 15-17 car, not relevant to this one other than 15-17's show 5-6whp and about 9-10wtq, like the other user did below.
- I dont think any of these are on E85, maybe the AFS one is but a bit skeptical on that graph.
Dyno provided by a member of a 2018+ car with headers, 93 tune, ported manifold before/after on a 2018+ car. Gains are a bit different the previous AFS dyno, headers, ported mani, 93 tune, STD correction etc. More lowend, less topend gains than AFS claims:
Dyno provided by AFS to support claims of 15-18whp for a 2018+ car with 2018+ ported manifold before/after (from their facebook page discussions). Looks like different smoothing being used maybe and lines are more jaggy if not, wonder why. Gains are 15whp and 7wtq supposedly, STD correction. Mods unknown otherwise.
In the search for truth and clarity here, wanted to break down what is known and unknown about ported 18 manifolds on ported 18+ manifolds. Too much partial or slightly "cloudy" information going around, as usual with some aftermarket parts not heavily tested on certain applications.
If anyone has real-life reviews of a ported 18+ manifold on a 2018+ GT (auto or stick cars) regarding driveability, and quirks/issues that arose, SoTP differences, and any new dyno data would be good too for the Airflow Solutions (or other porting vendors) in an actual 3rd party situation (not a magazine manifold shootout/etc with engine on an engine dyno outside the car etc), please pipe in and share data. We are assuming the IMRCs are active and in use of course, not locked out like on 15-17's for the swap.
Last info I found in my searches showed a single dyno from a guy with an 18+ with a before/after of just the Airflow Solutions (AFS) ported 18 mani swap for his stock 18 mani. Showed peak 5-6whp and 8-10wtq, with larger torque gains in the lower rpms which i think might be nice for daily punch around town. Seemed much more realistic than the 16-18whp gains claimed on 18+ cars by AFS. This was with longtubes, intake, 93 octane tune, etc.
Notes:
- VMP's shootout comparison is for a 15-17 car, not relevant to this one other than 15-17's show 5-6whp and about 9-10wtq, like the other user did below.
- I dont think any of these are on E85, maybe the AFS one is but a bit skeptical on that graph.
Dyno provided by a member of a 2018+ car with headers, 93 tune, ported manifold before/after on a 2018+ car. Gains are a bit different the previous AFS dyno, headers, ported mani, 93 tune, STD correction etc. More lowend, less topend gains than AFS claims:
Dyno provided by AFS to support claims of 15-18whp for a 2018+ car with 2018+ ported manifold before/after (from their facebook page discussions). Looks like different smoothing being used maybe and lines are more jaggy if not, wonder why. Gains are 15whp and 7wtq supposedly, STD correction. Mods unknown otherwise.
Sponsored