Sponsored

Octane on 17' GT

Wanka

Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2017
Threads
8
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Location
Alberta
Vehicle(s)
2017 Gt Convertible
I have been reading posts on this forum and somewhat confused on what octane is needed for the 5.0. In my manual it says 87 octane and it seems a lot of people are using higher octane without a tune.
I always understood that using higher octane than what the engine was designed for was a waste of money with no advantage.

I would appreciate it if somebody could clear this up for me. Here in Canada to go to 91 octane is almost 20 cents per litre more than 87, which can add up. However if there is a performance advantage it may be worth it.

Thanks...
Sponsored

 

UAmach1

Bullitt Hopefull
Joined
Oct 10, 2017
Threads
58
Messages
1,757
Reaction score
546
Location
PA
Vehicle(s)
Ford/INFINITI
The way modern ECU's work(after 2005 or so) is that they can use 87oct just fine. Benefit is it saves the driver money. When it detects a higher octane it will advance timing and produce more power. Benefit is more performance.
 

jacknifetoaswan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2016
Threads
49
Messages
1,425
Reaction score
760
Location
Charleston, SC
Vehicle(s)
2016 Race Red Mustang GT Premium Performance Pack
I'm fairly certain that my 2016 GT calls for 93 octane, but almost all modern engines, especially those with high compression, have knock sensors. If you put gas in with a lower octane, the knock sensor will identify it, then pull timing to resist detonation. You'll end up with less power than the advertised 435, but your engine will be safe.

JR
 

ghostnote

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2016
Threads
41
Messages
233
Reaction score
59
Location
PR
Vehicle(s)
Mustang GT 2015
On a stock tune, I see very little difference between 87 and 93. On a blind test, I'm sure I wouldn't be able to tell the difference.

By the way, the owner's manual specifically says there's a 1% power difference between those two fuels. on 435, that's less than 5hp. And when you factor in the 15-20% difference in price, well, premium really makes little sense. In my case, driving my GT about 6k miles per year, the difference is about $150.

On a tuned car, I'd imagine the difference is obvious.
 

jasonstang

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2015
Threads
18
Messages
5,551
Reaction score
1,296
Location
Omaha, NE
Vehicle(s)
2017 GB GT/CS 6MT
There is a dyno chart showed that even peak power is only 1% difference on stock tune, the mid range difference is about 20-30hp because how the stock tune is utilizing the extra octane around mid rpm range not at the peak.
Of course there is a difference between 87 and 91. Unless you are running a fixed timing and cam engine that is tuned for 87 only, there will always be some increase in performance and efficiency using higher octane. Whether it's worth the extra money or not is mainly personal choice.
 

Sponsored

sonicc

Mr. Bond
Joined
Nov 2, 2016
Threads
21
Messages
290
Reaction score
69
Location
St. Louis
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
If I'm driving my car to work 5 days a week, I just fill up with 87. If I'm going for a cruise/track event/etc. I use 93.
 

Sponsored

beefcake

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Oct 18, 2014
Threads
1,416
Messages
12,188
Reaction score
4,674
Location
Bethel
Vehicle(s)
2018 Ford Mustang
87 is fine, but like they said, 93 will maximize the power.

if you da tuner, at least 91 is what i would run
 

texasboy21

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 27, 2016
Threads
14
Messages
482
Reaction score
157
Location
Houston
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT PP. 2005.5 Audi A4, 1983 Silverado
My car feels like a dog below 5K RPMs on 87, and the gas mileage suffered as well.

It equates to a few dollars a fill up difference, so why NOT use 93?
 

AlmostFamous

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2016
Threads
15
Messages
575
Reaction score
293
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT
There is a dyno chart showed that even peak power is only 1% difference on stock tune, the mid range difference is about 20-30hp because how the stock tune is utilizing the extra octane around mid rpm range not at the peak.
Of course there is a difference between 87 and 91. Unless you are running a fixed timing and cam engine that is tuned for 87 only, there will always be some increase in performance and efficiency using higher octane. Whether it's worth the extra money or not is mainly personal choice.
This. There's a noticeable difference in mid-range power between 87 and 93 octane. There's another chart comparing 91 and 93 octane, and there was no power difference throughout the powerband. If you want maximum power on the stock tube, you'll need 91 octane or higher.
 

GTRacerX.

The Masked Racer
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Threads
76
Messages
1,085
Reaction score
399
Location
(25.688865, -80.393704)
First Name
Rex
Vehicle(s)
2017 Ford Mustang GT Premium PP
Fast & Furious

i don't live my life 1/4 mile at a time :D
I do :D Whenever I find a nice long road with no traffic or side streets -
Am giving my Stang some exercise. ;)


FYI: I use 93 in my Mustang since day one.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:
 




Top