NVH or Clunk from Camber Plates

[TheMark]

Please let us know what's done to resolve this.

Indeed I’ll be happy to share

Sponsored

 

[whalesalad]

What is the camber measurement without plates with common drops? I’m starting to think I might just pull these plates out and deal with the high degree of negative camber.

 

[ATTFighter]

What is the camber measurement without plates with common drops? I’m starting to think I might just pull these plates out and deal with the high degree of negative camber.

According to Steeda the front camber will be around -1.5 to -1.7 on most Mustangs with their progressive springs which only drop the car a inch. They said it will cause excessive wear on the inside edge of the front tire in normal street driving. They want the front camber setting around -1.0 to -1.3.

I'm getting their camber plates they won't even install the progressive springs unless you get the camber plates too because they won't be able to get it to spec. I previously thought they were only needed with more significant drops.

 

[whalesalad]

That is really interesting because the common aggressive alignment setup folks (including [MENTION=25806]SteedaTech[/MENTION]) recommend is

1.5 neg camber front and rear
1/16 toe front 0 toe rear

So in that case I seriously might just rip these out. Not worth the headache.

 

[TheMark]

edit... never mind this wasn’t useful info

 

[ATTFighter]

That is really interesting because the common aggressive alignment setup folks (including [MENTION=25806]SteedaTech[/MENTION]) recommend is



So in that case I seriously might just rip these out. Not worth the headache.

That's just what Steeda tech told me. You might want to keep them on if car won't be to spec without them.

Sponsored