Michael_vroomvroom
Well-Known Member
Please no. I could not have afforded the Mustang if it was like that.they should have styled it heavily like the 240Z IMO.
I wish the Mustang would lose the back seat - it serves no purpose unless you have passengers less than 12yrs old. Chop a foot+ out of the wheelbase and make an actual sports car out of the Mustang. THe 202X SUV shaped to look like a coup can have 2.5 doors and a back seat. Or just kiss off the people with small kids since for everything there is a CUV/SUV for your needs, such that sports cars become universally 2-seaters.
It's time to pick, fish or fowl, not this middle ground of neither and doing both rolls poorly.
I think the complains about the back seat are perhaps a bit exaggerated, though americans have a reputation around the world for being "big". Track day a month ago, a guy from my area had the clutch on his dedicated track car blow. Both he and his friend traveled the 200+ km (130+ miles) to the track in the track car. Both he and his friend hitched a ride back with me. The friend in the back said it wasn't the most comfortable seat he's had, but said it was "ok".
What I'd love was for the rear seats to be lower/thinner/whatever, so people a little taller can fit. Not fitting under the low rear ceiling is the main problem. An inch more head room in the back, people two inches taller can fit.
Think the friend, which is not on the slim side btw, a bit "american" looking one can perhaps say even, was about 170 cm , which is between 5"5 and 5"6. I had to insist he do a test fit before I agreed to them hitching a ride back with me, as I know 5"7 does not fit.
Sponsored