WItoTX
Well-Known Member
In all fairness, Ford did the same thing. The difference was they have a ton more money to blow on R&D than Shelby.I think if that's what they were trying to target, or if that's what their buyers wanted, they would. They'd also send out a test car to the magazines or invite them to the track to drive one vs a stock Mustang, or Dark Horse, or 1LE Camaro or whatever. But they don't.
It's a wonder that the big magazines don't review those cars or publish numbers for them.
One of the rare times I can remember is the 2015 SuperSnake. Back then it was only a $50k package!
https://www.roadandtrack.com/new-cars/road-tests/a26666/shelby-super-snake-road-test/
Again, it appears they just throw parts at the car and there's no actual testing or tuning.
The review basically talks about the mysterious lack of power, precarious handling, and even with 400 more horsepower and wizard tires, it couldn't beat a stock Boss 302 around the race track. And let's not forget that as great as the Boss 302 was, it got smoked by almost 10 seconds by a 2018 Mustang GT PP2 in the Car and Driver Lightning Lap.
But yes, these 350/R's from Shelby are absolutely built for the masses. When one of your lines is "Shelby... and tuned the suspension to ensure the car is as comfortable on daily drives as it is on track days."
One of those things can happen, Only one. So it's either good on track, or good on road. And guess which market is bigger...
Sponsored