Jasonb543
Well-Known Member
The gt350 and R would’ve been legendary with the 10R80…Mach 1 > Gt350
![]()
huge missed opportunity… they could’ve actually been something
Sponsored
The gt350 and R would’ve been legendary with the 10R80…Mach 1 > Gt350
![]()
The early GT350's and GT500's did come with an option for an auto.The gt350 and R would’ve been legendary with the 10R80…
huge missed opportunity… they could’ve actually been something
10R80 wasn't available in a Mustang in 2016 when the GT350 came outThe gt350 and R would’ve been legendary with the 10R80…
huge missed opportunity… they could’ve actually been something
With proper cooling (like the GT350 and GT500 and Mach 1 have) it would do just fine10R80 wasn't available in a Mustang in 2016 when the GT350 came out
10R80 can't hang at the race track anyway
https://www.mustang7g.com/forums/threads/dark-horse-limp-mode-on-track.161334/
https://trackmustangsonline.com/threads/one-track-season-done-with-the-dark-horse.21231/
https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/2020-mustang-gt-automatic-overheated-at-track.191153/
I posted two examples of the DH overheating the auto trans on the trackWith proper cooling (like the GT350 and GT500 and Mach 1 have) it would do just fine
You can get a lot of info here. Just keep in mind that 60 years of history has turned a cheap secretary’s car into one of the most iconic performance cars in history. It’s quite the story.As a relatively uneducated Ford historian, what characteristics make a mustang worthy of the GT350 moniker and does this new SA GT350 fit the bill?
Well then on two out of three counts the new Shelby GT350 hits the mark. And since it starts as a 301a it’s a winner.To me, A GT350 should be a no frills manual trans high rpm monster
The original GT350 was a track car as was the reincarnation in 2015. 0-60 times are for the dragstrip and is the purview of the GT500.Here’s a badass 2011 GT350!!0-60 in 4.2
![]()
Is that so?The original GT350 was a track car as was the reincarnation in 2015. 0-60 times are for the dragstrip and is the purview of the GT500.
Since he’s referencing the original 60’s cars, yes that is correct. The GT350 was the lighter track car and the GT500 was the sledgehammer. That has remained mostly true sinceIs that so?
That specific car was no slouch and faster than the GT500 and Supersnake that year
![]()
![]()
Sure, the 500 usually got the larger engine. But for the car in the post he quoted (2011 GT350, the car in the picture) it wasn't true that yearSince he’s referencing the original 60’s cars, yes that is correct. The GT350 was the lighter track car and the GT500 was the sledgehammer. That has remained mostly true since