Check here. They post very realistic times from what I have seen. https://www.zeroto60times.com/vehicle-make/chevrolet-0-60-mph-times/fast-slow-0-60/
I did the same thing with the EB and A10. That transmission in 'sport' is an abomination.
I did multiple searches on Corvette times too and was surprised they all said pretty much the same times as the Camaro, maybe a tenth or so faster to 60. Doesn't make sense since it is about 400 pounds lighter and better aero. Must be a traction issue. A good example is the 1320 Challenger is a good half second quicker than the regular SP when you launch it right.
One thing is the C7 Vette never got the much better A10 transmission that the MY18+ Mustang and MY19+ Camaro have, the 8-speed automatic is supposed to be pretty mediocre (and while the 7-speed manual in the Vette is pretty awesome, it's not going to beat the new A10 is a straight up drag race).
With a couple of friends we tested both cars, first on the dyno and then at the track, both bone stock except for drag radials, the camaro put down 405whp and the mustang 395whp, at the track the camaro went 12.1 to the mustang 12.2 i cant remember the MPH but the difference was much less than 0.1, in the end we all agreed that whoever got the best reaction time on the tree would win the race.
Yeah, you know, people with a brand bias (which is totally OK, I get it) will dismiss this, but it's pretty big downside. Also, I really dislike convertibles where the top position determines the amount of trunk space (like the Camaro). We can jump the GT, load up the trunk to its full capacity with the top up, drive to Orlando, hit Ace Cafe, and drop_the_top without worrying about if we can, or if we need to re-arrange, etc. To me, that's a major negative impact on the convertible experience.
I don't normally concern myself with trunk space (pickup, various hatchbacks) so I didn't think to check the Camaro since the Mustang trunk works great. Boy oh boy I want to choke the Camaro designer(s) who thought their implementation was acceptable. But on the other hand, it's not like I drive the Camaro to do errands more difficult than getting groceries for one. The C7 design should have been the pattern.
I hear you, I mean, I don't use my GT like a truck, we have a DD/RT when we need more space (hitch, a trailer).
)
Im looking at some of those cars in your list for a new daily driver.
I really disliked the c43. The ride quality was horrible even in the “normal mode”. I felt that the S4/S5 had a nicer interior, was faster, drove more comfortably, had better tech, and was cheaper. I personally hated the ATS, but it wasn’t a V.
I also was disappointed with the C43.
The reason the c43 ride is horrible are the run flats and goes with having 19s also. Go to a smaller wheel diameter and ditch the run craps and the ride will improve. Also the interior depends which one you get, the amg seats are quilted while the regular seats are just leather.
