Sponsored

My 0-60 time is not there.

MKL_DS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Threads
10
Messages
355
Reaction score
283
Location
Central Forida
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2020 GT PP1
I did 0-60 in 4.6 with my MT and it was at that time a stock 300A 6MT car. You should be bettering this. That being said 0-60 is really a ridiculous benchmark. I want to see 0-100 mph and 1/4mle times and mph.
0-60 is a good measure of traction and low end power.

I did this today at the track, 2020 PP1 with just a tune. It’s been faster with slightly better air but I didn’t have the dragy at that time.

2751D3B9-F7A7-4BF3-A631-563FD0290EF3.png
Sponsored

 

Laztug

Wanna run dyno slips bro?
Joined
Aug 12, 2014
Threads
24
Messages
1,115
Reaction score
287
Location
COTUS
Vehicle(s)
Calling out OKC #1 spot after axle back install.
Why not get a tire and take it to the track?
 

331GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
409
Reaction score
400
Location
Chicagoland
First Name
Dennis
Vehicle(s)
1995 DFG GT vert, 2019 Oxford White GT PP1
I messed around with mine a few times and got much slower than what the cars are supposedly capable of. i got a best of 4.6, gen 3 A10s they say sub 4. i never expected to get sub 4 myself but still. a few times i got over 5 with excessive spinning. i would have assumed excessive spinning was your issue but i didnt know all this about the traction control/advance trac. i didnt mess around with mine seriously enough either. ironically the best time i got, the 4.6, was on my way home from the rifle range with a passenger and a trunk full of firearms and ammo. and a full tank of gas, i had just topped it off. i think the extra weight probably helped me from spinning, with it all being in the back. im sure with some practice, heating up the tires, finding the sweet spot for launching, etc it would come down. come all the way to sub 4? probably not likely for me but who knows. FWIW mine was in drag mode only, i did nothing with traction control or advance track. i dont even remember what drag mode changes regarding traction control off hand. i want to say i left at about 2k but forget. bone stock '19 PP1, 275 pilot sports in back.
 

331GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
409
Reaction score
400
Location
Chicagoland
First Name
Dennis
Vehicle(s)
1995 DFG GT vert, 2019 Oxford White GT PP1
The sub 4 numbers are for a fastback, and are conducted on a prepped surface under ideal conditions. You've got a convertible, so you're already going to be a bit slower due to the added weight/reduced stiffness of the car. If you want to feel especially terrible, my gigantic Charger consistently puts down 4.1's on the street :giggle:

Mostly stock except for 295 PS4S upgrade.
my 19 is a fastback, my 95 is a convertible. its engine is also still on an engine stand, so the 95 is not doing any 0-60 runs just yet lol. maybe later this summer. i believe i had over 30 psi in my tires, i was not really planning on even trying 0-60 times, it was just out in a rural area and we said let's go see what it will do, ha.
 

331GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
409
Reaction score
400
Location
Chicagoland
First Name
Dennis
Vehicle(s)
1995 DFG GT vert, 2019 Oxford White GT PP1
Got it, misread the Vehicles sidebar. I actually haven't tried a 0-60 run since I put the PS4S's on the Mustang. I got 4.6's, but that was in the winter on the 255 Sotozero's. If I remember, I'll try to do a run and report back. I'm running 285's square, so it won't be apples to apples. I also don't have the PP parts, but I've done some chassis stiffening.
i honestly was expecting to get around a mid to high 4. my track apps shows my all time best as
0-60: 4.6
60 ft: 2.3
330 ft: 5.7
1/8: 8.4@91
1/4: 12.7@117.

supposedly they car is good for sub 12 bone stock. i would have liked to see lower 1/4 but my trap speed and 60ft indicates it's capable of more with better traction and a better launch. i knew full well i wasnt on a prepped track under ideal conditions, etc. im sure i could improve it all on my own with some practice, maybe sometime ill try again with a more concerted effort. also, i know that im doing this with track apps, which im sure isnt as accurate as being on a strip or having higher end timing gear for testing.

OP-sorry, not trying to hijack!! just wanted to post up a comparison for how much mine is off of what the claimed times are. yours sounds on the high side for sure, though i dont know that i have any more useful tips to offer beyond what others have already suggested.
 

Sponsored

LSchicago

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 11, 2018
Threads
92
Messages
2,929
Reaction score
2,535
Location
Illinois
First Name
Lloyd
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT/A 301A 5.0
Get a dragy instead of using the track app.
Yep. My draggy said 3.08 or 2.87 with 1 foot roll out last time at the track. Spinning into second because of bad prep.
 

hlfbkd420

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
2,178
Reaction score
2,346
Location
SW 'Merica
Website
www.youtube.com
First Name
Bilbo Hicks
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT w/ Roush P2 SC, 2015 KIA Sorento SXL
Yep. My draggy said 3.08 or 2.87 with 1 foot roll out last time at the track. Spinning into second because of bad prep.
bad ass. I want ones of those times :) best is 3.3.
 

MKL_DS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Threads
10
Messages
355
Reaction score
283
Location
Central Forida
First Name
Mike
Vehicle(s)
2020 GT PP1
The sub 4 numbers are for a fastback, and are conducted on a prepped surface under ideal conditions. You've got a convertible, so you're already going to be a bit slower due to the added weight/reduced stiffness of the car. If you want to feel especially terrible, my gigantic Charger consistently puts down 4.1's on the street :giggle:

Mostly stock except for 295 PS4S upgrade.
My 17 SP went 3.8 on a 275 radial at the track on a 12.005 run.
The stang is almost a tenth faster in same conditions but will take some work to see a sub 4.0 from what I’ve seen. Massive difference in the way they make power!
 

hlfbkd420

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
2,178
Reaction score
2,346
Location
SW 'Merica
Website
www.youtube.com
First Name
Bilbo Hicks
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT w/ Roush P2 SC, 2015 KIA Sorento SXL
Lmao just read his signature. They are turned off on mobile. That explains a few things. 😬

Edit: After reading up some, the general consensus was that the 3.15's (or 3.31's) are preferred for FI which I will be doing down the road at some point when she is not my daily. So I will not touch the gearing.

I appreciate all the info guys, you have been a massive help.
Signatures show up if you turn your phone sideways.
 

SSG 5.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Threads
33
Messages
803
Reaction score
225
Location
Texas
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT
Signatures show up if you turn your phone sideways.
Didn’t even knew that lol.

How’s that BMR vertical link? Any noticeable handling? That’s my next upgrade.
 

Sponsored

hlfbkd420

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
2,178
Reaction score
2,346
Location
SW 'Merica
Website
www.youtube.com
First Name
Bilbo Hicks
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT w/ Roush P2 SC, 2015 KIA Sorento SXL
Didn’t even knew that lol.

How’s that BMR vertical link? Any noticeable handling? That’s my next upgrade.
I didn’t really have much time after the install to get a good opinion on just the links. About 3 days after I installed them I had the Ford Performance Magnaride Handling Pack and cradle lockouts installed. Car is planted and rides great after all of the mods. Makes the car feel planted on launches.
 

Wamp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Threads
42
Messages
185
Reaction score
96
Location
Arizona
First Name
Collin
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
I have (almost) full BMR Suspension on my 2015 GT PP. MT82 car. Just intake, exhaust and 91 tune. 5200ft elevation.

BMR Drag Springs
BK081 (LCA Bearing)
CB005
CB762
TCA048 (Poly vertical link)
Shock mounts (J+M)
FP Toe link bearing
RTR shocks/struts (Kony yellow rebrand)
Steeda centering dowels in the rear
Steeda trans bushings
GT350 half shafts
BMR drag spec alignment (maxed out at -.6° camber)
Nitto NT555g2 295/35/20 on 10.5x20s.

On the street (Dragy) consistently runs 2.35-2.4 60ft, 3-4K rpm. Track mode, advance trac both on or off. 27-34psi, doesn’t seem to matter.

0-60 times always about 5.6s.

Went to the drag strip once with everything but the LCA Bearing installed. 2.25 60 foot, 13.5s @ 106.5mph. Replaced the rear wheel bearings after this… believe it or not, they were shot and causing a significant amount of wheel hop.

Interested to hit the strip again with the LCA bearings in… but I can’t, for the life of me, figure out why the 60 foot and 0-60 are so slow on a car with full suspension. I know the altitude has a big effect, but it shouldn’t affect the 60 foot and 0-60 THAT much…

CBFAE983-09E6-4E3C-B2DB-851A5B2C3D4B.jpeg
 

Wamp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Threads
42
Messages
185
Reaction score
96
Location
Arizona
First Name
Collin
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
Didn’t even knew that lol.

How’s that BMR vertical link? Any noticeable handling? That’s my next upgrade.
FWIW…

Biggest felt difference to smallest:
BMR BK055
BMR Drag springs + alignment
Wheel Bearing Replacement
Shocks + upper mounts
Steeda Diff bushings

Couldn’t tell a difference below this line launching on the street:

BMR 762
Vertical links
Steeda centering dowels.

@KellTrac has a good video on his YT Channel about suspension geometry. Somewhere around 20 mins, posted a month or so ago. Best explanation I’ve ever seen on the role played by vertical links, camber arms, and other parts
 

AZ18yote

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
3,220
Reaction score
1,523
Location
Arizona
First Name
Bryan
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT Prem PP Magnetic
I have (almost) full BMR Suspension on my 2015 GT PP. MT82 car. Just intake, exhaust and 91 tune. 5200ft elevation.

BMR Drag Springs
BK081 (LCA Bearing)
CB005
CB762
TCA048 (Poly vertical link)
Shock mounts (J+M)
FP Toe link bearing
RTR shocks/struts (Kony yellow rebrand)
Steeda centering dowels in the rear
Steeda trans bushings
GT350 half shafts
BMR drag spec alignment (maxed out at -.6° camber)
Nitto NT555g2 295/35/20 on 10.5x20s.

On the street (Dragy) consistently runs 2.35-2.4 60ft, 3-4K rpm. Track mode, advance trac both on or off. 27-34psi, doesn’t seem to matter.

0-60 times always about 5.6s.

Went to the drag strip once with everything but the LCA Bearing installed. 2.25 60 foot, 13.5s @ 106.5mph. Replaced the rear wheel bearings after this… believe it or not, they were shot and causing a significant amount of wheel hop.

Interested to hit the strip again with the LCA bearings in… but I can’t, for the life of me, figure out why the 60 foot and 0-60 are so slow on a car with full suspension. I know the altitude has a big effect, but it shouldn’t affect the 60 foot and 0-60 THAT much…

CBFAE983-09E6-4E3C-B2DB-851A5B2C3D4B.jpeg
Are you getting alot of wheel spin though? The 555g2 cannot hook for anything. Look into their 555r2 and its a night and day difference.
 

Wamp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Threads
42
Messages
185
Reaction score
96
Location
Arizona
First Name
Collin
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
Are you getting alot of wheel spin though? The 555g2 cannot hook for anything. Look into their 555r2 and its a night and day difference.
Very little with 295 555r2’s. Swapped into a set of 315 NTO5R’s I had, same deal. No decrease in time. See dragy footage. (Engine was hot… 5.99 0-60. Very consistent with that 2.38 60 foot time, though)

I’m pretty close to stock power… just a Catback and tune (91, yuck). Probably about the same as stock on 93.

0-60 Dragy Clip (AT off)
Sponsored

 
 




Top