Hack
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
- Threads
- 83
- Messages
- 12,318
- Reaction score
- 7,486
- Location
- Minneapolis
- Vehicle(s)
- Mustang, Camaro
I know that TW ratings are based on a government standard and that a manufacturer can be fined if they publish incorrect specs. I would say it's about as good as EPA fuel economy ratings. Yes you might not exactly get that number, but it's a good estimation and point of comparison. If you have a better standard that all manufacturers are following, please let me know.If you're basing that off tw values please just stop and learn something about the pointless nature of those values.
Not true. https://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=48&That's what I was trying to get at, most manufacturers have a different way of rating their tires. You have to compare the ratings to the same manufacturer.
Yes there are some issues with the comparison and TW ratings are not exact, but that's why I would say a tire with a 180 TW like the Cup 2 is probably pretty similar to the Supercar 3 with 220 TW. They aren't the same I'm sure, but they are more alike than the Supercar 3 is to a 4S Michelin that has a 300 TW rating.
And the flaws in the TW rating system are biggest for long life tires. 7,200 miles is a significant percentage of the total tire life for a Supercar 3 or Cup 2 tire, so those lower ratings are more likely to be accurate and comparable than the rating produced by running a tire with 80,000 mile estimated life for 7,200 miles. Since the test distance is only ~10% of that tire's life, the test becomes less accurate.
Sponsored