Sponsored

maximum square and staggered wheel and tire width stock suspension.

Flak

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Threads
30
Messages
979
Reaction score
184
Location
Phoenix
Vehicle(s)
2015 SVT Fusion Coupe
I still haven't seen numbers, just guesses. I'd also like to know if there's any wide square setups with the same offset rims and no spacer on the rears.
 

JoeC1982

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2014
Threads
12
Messages
113
Reaction score
7
Location
arkansas
Vehicle(s)
2013 ATS 2.0T
I was thinking about doing the TSW Bathurst in 19x9 +30 all around, i guess on stock tires with some drop springs. They have a +20 also so i'll probably buy a pair of +30's first and see how they fit on the back. Just have to get the car first, the wait is tough.
 

dwaleke

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2014
Threads
19
Messages
896
Reaction score
117
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
Jeep
+30 is really aggressive in the rear. I'd like to see someone try it.
 

Sponsored

JoeC1982

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2014
Threads
12
Messages
113
Reaction score
7
Location
arkansas
Vehicle(s)
2013 ATS 2.0T
+30 is really aggressive in the rear. I'd like to see someone try it.
It's only like 15mm further out than stock since the stock wheels are the same width on an Ecoboost PP car.

30 should be fine with a 9" on the rear

10.5 with a 45 is golden
I think the +20 might work in the rear but probably not worth losing the ability to rotate tires. I wanted to run a 265/40R19 also over the stock 255's but there are hardly any choices. The only thing i saw i would run is a Pilot Super Sport and they were $315 each with my discount.
 

carguy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2013
Threads
23
Messages
349
Reaction score
78
Location
Cardiff, CA
First Name
Greg
Vehicle(s)
2015 GT PP
10" wide with an offset of +40 is the max that you can run front and rear without going to spacers for the front. For example, a 10.5" with an offset of +45 to 48 is great on the back but will hit the strut up front without a 10 to 12mm spacer.
 

jayman33

Well-Known Member
Diamond Sponsor
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Threads
197
Messages
2,619
Reaction score
1,071
Location
Fort Bragg, NC
First Name
Jason
Vehicle(s)
15 PP
It comes down to a few things really. Aggressive offsets are great however, they limit your ability to run many larger tires due to rubbing. 10.5 with 45mm offset is the absolute lowest offset I would run, 10 inch with 38-40 is the lowest, 9.5 inch with 33mm is the lowest and 9 inch with 26-27 mm is the lowest offset.

Those offsets and sizes are already aggressive, anything else you'll need that "stretched" tire look.

Let us know if we can help you out, we've been personally testing as many wheels on our car as possible.
 
OP
OP
EcoSnake

EcoSnake

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2014
Threads
16
Messages
539
Reaction score
92
Location
AZ
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard EB PP
It comes down to a few things really. Aggressive offsets are great however, they limit your ability to run many larger tires due to rubbing. 10.5 with 45mm offset is the absolute lowest offset I would run, 10 inch with 38-40 is the lowest, 9.5 inch with 33mm is the lowest and 9 inch with 26-27 mm is the lowest offset.

Those offsets and sizes are already aggressive, anything else you'll need that "stretched" tire look.

Let us know if we can help you out, we've been personally testing as many wheels on our car as possible.

What's the maximum tire sizes for those wheel widths and offsets?

19"x10.5" +45 ?
19"x10" +38 ?
19"x9.5" +33 ?

Would a square 19"x10.5" work with 285/40/19?
Sponsored

 
 




Top