MAPerformance: Ultimate R&D Thread | Air, Fuel, & Turbo Upgrades

[MAPerformance]

This is exciting! I'm predicting ~440whp before fine tune and ~460whp before your throw a rod

I'm laying down some pigmats just in case she goes!

Sponsored

 

[bigspoondude]

I'm laying down some pigmats just in case she goes!

Newspaper or go home! Keep the kitty litter on standby for the extra messy bits.

 

[MAPerformance]

Newspaper or go home! Keep the kitty litter on standby for the extra messy bits.

 

[Brad]

What's the difference between the turbo kit DP and the catless DP on your website? And so excited for dyno results today! :cheers:

 

[MAPerformance]

What's the difference between the turbo kit DP and the catless DP on your website? And so excited for dyno results today! :cheers:

No results today unfortunately, prototype fuel pump needs some tweaks.

Downpipe for the turbo kit is specific to the turbo kit, it will not work with the stock turbo.

 

[AngelOreo]

It is P1.5 which is our P1 kit with the addition of our intercooler kit like Jason said above.

Here is the graph, I'll be posting up a thread soon!

Sir... Did you create a P1.5 thread or Purchase Link on your website for this yet? Just curious.

Jim

 

[MAPerformance]

Sir... Did you create a P1.5 thread or Purchase Link on your website for this yet? Just curious.

Jim

http://www.maperformance.com/map-p1.5-performance-package-2015-ford-mustang-ecoboost-ebm-p1.5.html

 

[Sup3rPat]

Hitting the dyno today with a Ball Bearing 6466!

Any updates!?

 

[MAPerformance]

Any updates!?

Needing some custom software changes from Cobb before we can go any further with the bigger turbo as it is flowing some serious air.

I don't think we are going to get much further without putting our ported cylinder head on. The factory head is KILLING this car up top, no matter how big of a turbo you put on it the head is only going to allow so much air through the engine.

Just for a comparison on this cylinder head, a stock ford escort head from a 1994 GT flows 25% more CFM than the ecoboost mustang head. It's terrible!

 

[bigspoondude]

Needing some custom software changes from Cobb before we can go any further with the bigger turbo as it is flowing some serious air.

I don't think we are going to get much further without putting our ported cylinder head on. The factory head is KILLING this car up top, no matter how big of a turbo you put on it the head is only going to allow so much air through the engine.

Just for a comparison on this cylinder head, a stock ford escort head from a 1994 GT flows 25% more CFM than the ecoboost mustang head. It's terrible!

Should pick up an MPG or two then, even with the bigger valves?

 

[MAPerformance]

Should pick up an MPG or two then, even with the bigger valves?

I guess I don't follow, you mean when we put our ported head on it should gain some MPG? If that is what you were saying, possibly but we will never know as it will be making big power at that point and will probably always be beat on.

 

[Bomicino]

Sucks to hear this about the head. Will you be doing the ported head with stock cams first?

 

[MAPerformance]

Sucks to hear this about the head. Will you be doing the ported head with stock cams first?

Yes, there is no other choice. The one company I'm working with on camshafts is going to be awhile before they release.

 

[jbailer]

Adam, do you think the head is restricting even with the stock turbo? I'm wondering if we could approach that 400/400 mark on 93 with just ported heads, your tune and maybe a downpipe?

 

[RubyRed15]

I don't think we are going to get much further without putting our ported cylinder head on. The factory head is KILLING this car up top, no matter how big of a turbo you put on it the head is only going to allow so much air through the engine.

I'm calling it: head porting is the silver bullet for the top end fall-off.

Can't wait to see the results.

Sponsored