hiiammarcin
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
So this is a two part question.
1. According to my homework, GT350/R spring rates (lb/in) are actually same or higher (rear) than some of the aftermarket ones, like the FP kit. Unless I am not understanding the concept here, what would be the benefit gained other than the .78" drop?
GT350R
Front: 240
Rear: 914
GT350
Front: 194
Rear: 914
Using this post:
https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/m-5300-w-fp-spring-rates.91226/
Ford Performance Spring Rate:
.78" drop
Front lb/in: 250-260
Rear lb/in: 565 (avg) - 735 (max)
2. In the same thread the a fellow named Epiphany lists that GT350R front spring (fr32-5310-m ) is 10" vs 11.25" on the GT350. This in fact would suggest that the R's front end is lower than GT350 by 1.25", is that correct? I've always people say that the height is actually the same.
1. According to my homework, GT350/R spring rates (lb/in) are actually same or higher (rear) than some of the aftermarket ones, like the FP kit. Unless I am not understanding the concept here, what would be the benefit gained other than the .78" drop?
GT350R
Front: 240
Rear: 914
GT350
Front: 194
Rear: 914
Using this post:
https://www.mustang6g.com/forums/threads/m-5300-w-fp-spring-rates.91226/
Ford Performance Spring Rate:
.78" drop
Front lb/in: 250-260
Rear lb/in: 565 (avg) - 735 (max)
2. In the same thread the a fellow named Epiphany lists that GT350R front spring (fr32-5310-m ) is 10" vs 11.25" on the GT350. This in fact would suggest that the R's front end is lower than GT350 by 1.25", is that correct? I've always people say that the height is actually the same.
Sponsored