Sponsored

I love electronics but....

ctandc72

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2017
Threads
44
Messages
1,610
Reaction score
1,072
Location
VA
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT 6 speed Base
Vehicle Showcase
1
Self-driving cars - the technology I agree is there...the issue involves liability.

Still way too many question marks.

As for electric vehicles - battery technology has a LONG way to go before even thinking about replacing the internal combustion engine on a mass scale. The 'accepted fact' of a decade ago - that we were running out of oil - has been proved false. Weirdly enough, advancing technology has helped us realize there is a huge amount of oil just waiting to be pumped. The issue, as it always is, is price vs effort. I grew up with a guy who is heavily involved in the oil industry. It's all about price. When the price gets to a certain level, you'll see known deposits start to get tapped.

As for Tesla....the hard truth is - he could not afford to make cars without the massive government subsidies and low-interest loans he has gotten and still gets - and more importantly MANY BUYERS would NOT opt for or be able to afford an electric vehicle if not for the tax breaks / credits the receive by doing so.

This isn't personal opinion. Do a little digging on his profit / loss statements and find what "doesn't count" toward his current bottom line.

Cars is NOT where he makes / has made his money.

This is not a knock on him or Tesla - it's just the facts.

The other thing that no one seems to ever want to mention about electric cars is their impact on the environment when it comes to the precious metals (less available worldwide than oil) that are needed to produce and more importantly their batteries and their impact on the environment after their serviceable life is over. Not to mention the source of these precious metals and the burgeoning economies of the countries mining / exporting them now.

Leading scientists / experts are still shooting down 'environmentalists' when they talk of the "net benefit" to the planet of replacing a conventional automobile with an electric car. The most 'planet friendly' choice is to buy a used, economical car. I only mention this since one of the big 'emotional' pushes towards hybrids and electric cars is "saving the planet".

It's not just an age gap or generation that has people sitting on different sides of the self-driving car issue....

A lot of it is a control issue.

How many regulatory agencies and bodies would be created if self-driving cars became common place? Who would be in charge of these entities? The government. Please let me know the last time any government started such a huge undertaking and ran it on an efficient and cost-effective scale?

If self-driving cars become common, how long before regulations or more likely, large "luxury" taxes are imposed on people who want to drive themselves in a normal car?

As for job loss...it's not happening yet. Needs are just shifting and some "old" professions are STILL in HIGH demand and in fact many technical trades are HURTING for applicants and people to be trained.

My next door neighbor worked in the corporate insurance environment for 20+ years until '08 when he was bought out and forced to retire. He took some schooling and less than 9 years later - he's a licensed HVAC technician and works less hours and makes more money than he ever did before.

Sure alot of things change....but many things stay the same. Until we have affordable robots coming to fix our toilets, air conditioners etc - there will be plenty of good paying jobs available for those people who want to earn a healthy paycheck.

Just my 2 cents.
Sponsored

 

rekloos

Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2017
Threads
1
Messages
7
Reaction score
9
Location
Michigan
Vehicle(s)
F150 Lariat
Not only will you lose your jobs but losing your freedom to quickly move about is at risk with driverless cars. Driverless cars will not be a good thing for the majority of people, especially if the government has anything to do with them.
 

jtmat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 8, 2015
Threads
9
Messages
1,995
Reaction score
881
Location
DC/MD/VA metro
Vehicle(s)
Vert turbo!!!!
Self-driving cars - the technology I agree is there...the issue involves liability.

Still way too many question marks.

As for electric vehicles - battery technology has a LONG way to go before even thinking about replacing the internal combustion engine on a mass scale. The 'accepted fact' of a decade ago - that we were running out of oil - has been proved false. Weirdly enough, advancing technology has helped us realize there is a huge amount of oil just waiting to be pumped. The issue, as it always is, is price vs effort. I grew up with a guy who is heavily involved in the oil industry. It's all about price. When the price gets to a certain level, you'll see known deposits start to get tapped.

As for Tesla....the hard truth is - he could not afford to make cars without the massive government subsidies and low-interest loans he has gotten and still gets - and more importantly MANY BUYERS would NOT opt for or be able to afford an electric vehicle if not for the tax breaks / credits the receive by doing so.

This isn't personal opinion. Do a little digging on his profit / loss statements and find what "doesn't count" toward his current bottom line.

Cars is NOT where he makes / has made his money.

This is not a knock on him or Tesla - it's just the facts.

The other thing that no one seems to ever want to mention about electric cars is their impact on the environment when it comes to the precious metals (less available worldwide than oil) that are needed to produce and more importantly their batteries and their impact on the environment after their serviceable life is over. Not to mention the source of these precious metals and the burgeoning economies of the countries mining / exporting them now.

Leading scientists / experts are still shooting down 'environmentalists' when they talk of the "net benefit" to the planet of replacing a conventional automobile with an electric car. The most 'planet friendly' choice is to buy a used, economical car. I only mention this since one of the big 'emotional' pushes towards hybrids and electric cars is "saving the planet".

It's not just an age gap or generation that has people sitting on different sides of the self-driving car issue....

A lot of it is a control issue.

How many regulatory agencies and bodies would be created if self-driving cars became common place? Who would be in charge of these entities? The government. Please let me know the last time any government started such a huge undertaking and ran it on an efficient and cost-effective scale?

If self-driving cars become common, how long before regulations or more likely, large "luxury" taxes are imposed on people who want to drive themselves in a normal car?

As for job loss...it's not happening yet. Needs are just shifting and some "old" professions are STILL in HIGH demand and in fact many technical trades are HURTING for applicants and people to be trained.

My next door neighbor worked in the corporate insurance environment for 20+ years until '08 when he was bought out and forced to retire. He took some schooling and less than 9 years later - he's a licensed HVAC technician and works less hours and makes more money than he ever did before.

Sure alot of things change....but many things stay the same. Until we have affordable robots coming to fix our toilets, air conditioners etc - there will be plenty of good paying jobs available for those people who want to earn a healthy paycheck.

Just my 2 cents.
You hit it on with the environmental argument. That is going to be an issue.

Far as control... I don't think that will be an issue with the majority of people growing up into a world with driver-less cars. If you never had it, how can you miss it? And then as people get older, they won't want to drive. For a little while you will have a small selection of people who want to drive... even then radio/tv/internet "mind programming" will tell people how dangerous it is. You already know the FAR majority will roll over and go with it. Heck, who does not want to get in more Facebook time? I'm sure most will couch it as "spending more face time with the kids" though.

And don't forget the "cash for clunkers"... remember that? Yea, the gov't will destroy all the old cars... people will be happy to turn them over. Picture that... no fight there.

Far as the gov't regulations and such, I don't see it... nothing more than we already have. We might have a luxury tax for "x years" but it won't last long... it will be a transition period. Most will have to visit a track to drive. Even that will be dumb to most young people. Heck, try driving into London... even Manhattan is is considering a $11 tax for driving. Heck if old cars can't pass the new emissions.. ooppsss... new car.

Young people won't own cars.... we pay to have tons of cars sit all day right now. Now that is stupid.... wish I could send my car out and make money while I'm at work all day. Question becomes, what do you do with that reclaimed space you no longer need for parking?

It also becomes a city vs. country issue... different needs for those folks.

[MENTION=24624]HISSMAN[/MENTION] - I feel you there.... I remember a time before 911... guy who got shot in the head walked over to our house. Took us forever to track down a number for an ambulance (we lived deep country). Yea, the good old days my butt. I remember when pagers came along... that was the most dangerous times... get out to use a phone booth in all kinds of neighborhoods.
 

Anthony 05 GT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2015
Threads
21
Messages
1,453
Reaction score
494
Location
Northern Harford County Maryland
Vehicle(s)
2005 Mustang GT, 2015 Mustang GT Premium
I'm a electric forklift technician and I agree, battery technology has a long way to go before I'd be happy with it. A 48 volt battery in a 5000 lb capacity forklift weighs about 3500 lbs. That same battery costs around 8k. One of these batteries allows the forklift to run non stop for about 6 hrs. if it's a new battery. The older the battery gets, the worse it performs.

Unfortunately, the internal combustion engine has it's days numbered. I for one have often thought about ways to have a twin battery pack car that one battery charges while the other is being used. I'd like to see a way to tap into the wasted, expelled energy from the vehicle. Maybe find a way to tap into the heat energy from brakes or having some sort of weighted flywheel generator that gets it momentum from driving down hill. The extra battery gets charged, then switch to it when needed. This is not a far fetched idea, but the current crop of batteries are not that good. The best batteries are even more expensive.
Sponsored

 
 








Top