Ford has traditionally been conservative with the power numbers.Please share results! Are you stock? The old assumption of deducting a15% driveline loss seems a bit high. Unless Ford is under rating our power, if we use a10% loss, we are looking at about 684.
100% stock.Please share results! Are you stock? The old assumption of deducting a15% driveline loss seems a bit high. Unless Ford is under rating our power, if we use a10% loss, we are looking at about 684.
Erolivas- thanks for posting -do you know if the pulls were made in fourth gear ?I had mine on the dyno back in December for a couple of baseline line. Pull took place in Albuquerque (@ DynoEdge) where the altitude is 5312’ and had to make a 100 mile trip to get there. The car was a ‘little’ warm when we did the pulls.
No problem. Yes those pulls were in 4th gear.Erolivas- thanks for posting -do you know if the pulls were made in fourth gear ?
Wow, so far what I am seeing are 4th gear pulls with hp from a low of 645 to a high of 708 with SAE correction.. DIscrepancies, I am guessing are individual Dyno differences. Wonder if fueling makes up some of the differnce. For example, the 760 claim is only using 93 octane, but most of the country only has 91, so the computer could be pulling some timing. Any other variables to a count for the differences?No problem. Yes those pulls were in 4th gear.