- Joined
- Dec 8, 2015
- Threads
- 225
- Messages
- 4,787
- Reaction score
- 7,002
- Location
- Sacramento, CA
- Website
- www.signaturewheel.com
- Vehicle(s)
- 2017 GT350R
- Thread starter
- #106
The next order is in! Only 15 sets left available
Sponsored
Can’t wait for my set!The next order is in! Only 15 sets left available
Sweet. Mine are on the way.Got mine! Photos tomorrow.
George at MGW, you, and John at ZL1 addons were listed as co-collaberators. Who do I call next?Tom, liability has limited the response to your questions at ARP. Without tesing a specific application they are hesitant to quote a number.
The percentage reduction in torque values when using a thread lubricant is often times higher than one would think. A quick example...https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/torque-lubrication-effects-d_1693.html
Yes, don't think for a minute that I'm complaining, but I'm trying to do this right. Between you and your co-colaberators, I'm surprised there isn't a consensus on a recommended torque value with a common thread lube like ARP.And T, you did a great job with the lug nuts. Kudos to you for your efforts.
You can get there empirically. Your 30% reduction in torque spec from factory (dry, clean threads) to lubed is a good guess. Heat cycle the hubs and drive 50+ miles, and re-check the torque. If the lugs are not backing off, you're fine. If any are loose, take them all up 10 ft-lbs to 110 ft-lbs and repeat.Yes, don't think for a minute that I'm complaining, but I'm trying to do this right. Between you and your co-colaberators, I'm surprised there isn't a consensus on a recommended torque value with a common thread lube like ARP.