02gtnh
Well-Known Member
They did that with the a10, not the manual. After they fixed the a10, then it lapped faster then the 6m.Now we've seen what the ZL1 can do when GM engineers don't make improvements between runs.
Sponsored
They did that with the a10, not the manual. After they fixed the a10, then it lapped faster then the 6m.Now we've seen what the ZL1 can do when GM engineers don't make improvements between runs.
So, if you buy a ZL-1 - will GM give you some engineers to help "fix" yours as well?They did that with the a10, not the manual. After they fixed the a10, then it lapped faster then the 6m.
You'll say anything to try to favor the GM product, won't you?So the magical margin of error is up to half a second now? I mean, that dang margin of error just keeps growing and growing.
Just being real. :cheers:So, if you buy a ZL-1 - will GM give you some engineers to help "fix" yours as well?
All it was is tire pressure, real tuff to do.:headbonk:
You'll say anything to try to favor the GM product, won't you?
Only when it's a Chevy guy telling the tale. A half second is a monumental, insurmountable, gap when talking about the SS straight line margin over the current GT.:shrug: But to be fair. A half second is a but kicking straight line or road course. Just gotta learn you cant have it both ways.So the magical margin of error is up to half a second now? I mean, that dang margin of error just keeps growing and growing.
It was interesting. Not sure I buy into Randy's "why the ZL1" is slower this time out side bar. I'm not sure if he is blaming the tire, crappy track conditions, or what. Assuming the track app, GPS, or whatever telemetry measurements they are using are accurate, the GT350R manages entry and exit speeds better or so it appears to me.Here's the Motor Trend H2H article:
http://www.motortrend.com/cars/ford...l1-vs-2017-ford-mustang-shelby-gt350r-review/
Well if someone tells me that 4 tenths of a second is within the margin of error I think I would say something realistic. 4 tenths is nowhere near the margin of error.You'll say anything to try to favor the GM product, won't you?
I think on any track that is quite the beating. But I also think a really good driver could turn that around against a decent driver. We are only seeing what the car can do. In the hands of a driver is when you see the real results. I expected the Camaro to win. I think the GT350R did really good for going up against something with a substantial amount more power. And I won't take anything away from either car. But that ZL1 is just pretty amazing and as an enthusiast, I am impressed.Only when it's a Chevy guy telling the tale. A half second is a monumental, insurmountable, gap when talking about the SS straight line margin over the current GT.:shrug: But to be fair. A half second is a but kicking straight line or road course. Just gotta learn you cant have it both ways.
Me to. I'd go as far as to call it the best bang for your buck in the industry right now.But that ZL1 is just pretty amazing and as an enthusiast, I am impressed.
If conditions the second time could only support cornering speeds just 1 mph less than before, that same car would be (roughly) 1 mph slower everywhere. Could be green track, could be tire heat cycles, but 1 mph slower could easily add a second or more depending on the track length and typical average speeds.It was interesting. Not sure I buy into Randy's "why the ZL1" is slower this time out side bar. I'm not sure if he is blaming the tire, crappy track conditions, or what.
You'd probably have to find out if transmission gearing and gear spacing favored one car over the other as well. Tire and rim weight could be a contributing factor. But these considerations can't explain the difference in Camaro lap times.Also - does the track lend itself to the RPM range of the 350R and the 6500 RPM of the ZL1 fall on its face? Less weight or rims a factor here?
Thank you Norm.If conditions the second time could only support cornering speeds just 1 mph less than before, that same car would be (roughly) 1 mph slower everywhere. Could be green track, could be tire heat cycles, but 1 mph slower could easily add a second or more depending on the track length and typical average speeds.
You'd probably have to find out if transmission gearing and gear spacing favored one car over the other as well. Tire and rim weight could be a contributing factor. But these considerations can't explain the difference in Camaro lap times.
Norm
LolIt was interesting. Not sure I buy into Randy's "why the ZL1" is slower this time out side bar. I'm not sure if he is blaming the tire, crappy track conditions, or what. Assuming the track app, GPS, or whatever telemetry measurements they are using are accurate, the GT350R manages entry and exit speeds better or so it appears to me.
Also - does the track lend itself to the RPM range of the 350R and the 6500 RPM of the ZL1 fall on its face? Less weight or rims a factor here?
Don't forget the supercharger while you're at it, mkay?Did the GT350R have the Tech Pack? I haven't watched the video, but that's probably what Ford sent them. If thats the case, the only thing separating the GT350R and the ZL1 is a backseat.
Anddon't forget the AC (standard on the ZL1). And the radio (standard on the ZL1). Heated/cooled seats (standard on the ZL1). Heated steering wheel (standard on the ZL1). Wireless charging system (standard on the ZL1). WIFI (standard on the ZL1)...Don't forget the supercharger while you're at it, mkay?
which contributes very little negatively compared to the complete game changer a supercharger is.Anddon't forget the AC (standard on the ZL1). And the radio (standard on the ZL1). Heated/cooled seats (standard on the ZL1). Heated steering wheel (standard on the ZL1). Wireless charging system (standard on the ZL1). WIFI (standard on the ZL1)...