Sponsored

Got to go to a Dyno yesterday

Cxp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2019
Threads
2
Messages
86
Reaction score
37
Location
Arizona
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2018 EB app
I asked CP-E over FB messenger about built engines/shortblock for 2.3L and they said it’s in the plans.
 

jdsfly

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2019
Threads
0
Messages
90
Reaction score
57
Location
Wilmington, DE
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang Ecoboost, A10
Vehicle Showcase
1
For comparisons sake, keep in mind these dyno runs were made using the STD J607 correction factor, which gives the most favorable numbers. SAE J1349 is the more common correction factor and would give a little lower numbers.
 
OP
OP

prostovovatt

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2015
Threads
23
Messages
259
Reaction score
70
Location
Baltimore
Vehicle(s)
2018 Orange Fury Ecoboost Manual Performance Pack
I asked CP-E over FB messenger about built engines/shortblock for 2.3L and they said it’s in the plans.

That has been in their plans for a minute, but I will definitely move up to one of those given the next three statements are all true

1 - I exceed the mileage allotment for the powertrain warranty
2 - I pay the car off
3 - I still own it

lol but I am definitely a big fan of and supporter of CP-e

For comparisons sake, keep in mind these dyno runs were made using the STD J607 correction factor, which gives the most favorable numbers. SAE J1349 is the more common correction factor and would give a little lower numbers.

Out of curiosty, how do you know?
 

shogun32

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
14,608
Reaction score
12,098
Location
Northern VA
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
Vehicle Showcase
2
keep in mind these dyno runs were made using the STD J607 correction factor,
Comparing dyno results (to less than 3-5% deviation) is pointless unless it's the same car, same operator, same day/time, same atmospherics.
 

Sponsored

jdsfly

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2019
Threads
0
Messages
90
Reaction score
57
Location
Wilmington, DE
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang Ecoboost, A10
Vehicle Showcase
1
That has been in their plans for a minute, but I will definitely move up to one of those given the next three statements are all true

1 - I exceed the mileage allotment for the powertrain warranty
2 - I pay the car off
3 - I still own it

lol but I am definitely a big fan of and supporter of CP-e




Out of curiosty, how do you know?
That has been in their plans for a minute, but I will definitely move up to one of those given the next three statements are all true

1 - I exceed the mileage allotment for the powertrain warranty
2 - I pay the car off
3 - I still own it

lol but I am definitely a big fan of and supporter of CP-e




Out of curiosty, how do you know?
It's in the top right corner of your dyno sheet, CF: STD.
 

jdsfly

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2019
Threads
0
Messages
90
Reaction score
57
Location
Wilmington, DE
First Name
Dave
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang Ecoboost, A10
Vehicle Showcase
1
Comparing dyno results (to less than 3-5% deviation) is pointless unless it's the same car, same operator, same day/time, same atmospherics.
If your using a correction factor on the dyno, the atmospherics don't matter, as the correction factor takes the uncorrected HP and torque numbers and mathematically changes them to the standardized atmospherics of the given correction factor. With the STD/J607 correction factor, the parameters are 60°F at sea level, 29.92", and 0% humidity, if I recall correctly. The SAE/J1349 correction factor, the most commonly used, uses 77° F at sea level, 29.92", and O% humidity.
 
 




Top