Sponsored

Give me your best guess? Advice needed

dlct3

Active Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Threads
6
Messages
31
Reaction score
3
Location
Central MO
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT
2018 PP car for road course. Factory wheels and Tires weigh 60lbs up front and 64 in the rear and of course the standard factory 19" widths on Michelin 4S. I'm considering a set of forged 19x10.5 fronts weighing 20lbs each and rears 19x11's same weight of 20lbs each plus a set of Michelin Sport Cup 2's for on track and some road use. Those in a 305/30-19 weight 26lbs so I figure with wheel weights & sensors mounted approx. 47lbs +/- Saving around 13lbs each corner up front and 17lbs out back. The car has upgraded brake pads, stainless lines, springs, suspension, semi-track alignment fluid, etc for handling.

My big question. On a 2.07 lap time around a road course how much is this added braking, acceleration, & grip worth in time?
Sponsored

 

ddozier

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Threads
6
Messages
444
Reaction score
453
Location
STL
Website
www.trackcarbuilds.com
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT PP
All your gains will be from the tire change, wheel & tire weight change is less impactful then proper tire pressures and alignment to make best use of your new combo.

these are number from Michelin on comparable tires and times. Glean from it what you will.

  1. Based on internal dry circuit lap time tests comparing the MICHELIN® PILOT® Sport 4 S (39.25 sec. avg. lap time) versus the Bridgestone® Potenza™ S-04 Pole Position™ (40.70 sec. avg. lap time), Continental® ExtremeContact™ Sport (40.03 sec. avg. lap time), Pirelli® P ZERO™ PZ4 (40.24 sec. avg. lap time), and Goodyear® Eagle® F1 Asymmetric 3 (40.44 sec. avg. lap time) in tire size 235/35ZR19 91Y using a 2015 BMW 328i. Actual on-road results may vary.

  2. Based on internal dry braking tests from 60 mph to 0 mph comparing the MICHELIN® PILOT® Sport 4 S (106.0 ft. avg. stopping distance) versus the Bridgestone® Potenza™ S-04 Pole Position™ (119.4 ft. avg. stopping distance), Continental® ExtremeContact™ Sport (115.9 ft. avg. stopping distance), Pirelli® P ZERO™ PZ4 (118.3 ft. avg. stopping distance), and Goodyear® Eagle® F1 Asymmetric 3 (115.2 ft. avg. stopping distance) in tire size 235/35ZR19 91Y using a 2015 BMW 328i. Actual on-road results may vary.

  3. Based on internal wet circuit lap time tests comparing the MICHELIN® PILOT® Sport 4 S (37.23 sec. avg. lap time) versus the Bridgestone® Potenza™ S-04 Pole Position™ (38.65 sec. avg. lap time), Continental® ExtremeContact™ Sport (38.87 sec. avg. lap time), Pirelli® P ZERO™ PZ4 (39.42 sec. avg. lap time), and Goodyear® Eagle® F1 Asymmetric 3 (38.52 sec. avg. lap time) in tire size 235/35ZR19 91Y using a 2015 BMW 328i. Actual on-road results may vary.

  4. Based on internal wet braking tests from 50 mph to 0 mph comparing the MICHELIN® PILOT® Sport 4 S (97.0 ft. avg. stopping distance) versus the Bridgestone® Potenza™ S-04 Pole Position™ (112.6 ft. avg. stopping distance), Continental® ExtremeContact™ Sport (108.5 ft. avg. stopping distance), Pirelli® P ZERO™ PZ4 (112.9 ft. avg. stopping distance), and Goodyear® Eagle® F1 Asymmetric 3 (108.4 ft. avg. stopping distance) in tire size 235/35ZR19 91Y using a 2015 BMW 328i. Actual on-road results may vary.
Dave
 

NightmareMoon

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2015
Threads
41
Messages
5,663
Reaction score
4,682
Location
Austin
Vehicle(s)
2016 Mustang GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
Agreed, the biggest difference will be in grip from the MP4S->SC2 change. The rotational inertia from the weight of the wheels and tires factors in mainly at lower speeds, and won't have a huge effect on lap times on a road course.

Times from the tire change could be significant. Maybe 2 seconds or more if I had to guess.
 

wmfateam

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 4, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
318
Reaction score
142
Location
Arizona
Website
www.facebook.com
First Name
Whitey
Vehicle(s)
2017 LB GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
 

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
15,010
Reaction score
8,921
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
His way
My way
 

Sponsored

Austinj427

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2017
Threads
11
Messages
806
Reaction score
448
Location
CO
Vehicle(s)
2017 GT350
Vehicle Showcase
1
I bet you pick up 5-6 seconds depending on how technical the track is. Don't overheat those cups.

In my experience, lighter wheels and tires are quite helpful.
 

Hack

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2014
Threads
83
Messages
12,311
Reaction score
7,480
Location
Minneapolis
Vehicle(s)
Mustang, Camaro
I bet you pick up 5-6 seconds depending on how technical the track is. Don't overheat those cups.

In my experience, lighter wheels and tires are quite helpful.
I agree. The main differences between the R and regular GT350 are the lighter wheels plus better tires.

Reduced rotational mass really improves acceleration and deceleration. I have no idea how much faster the car will be around the track with the change the OP was talking about, though.
 

Rodan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2018
Threads
2
Messages
57
Reaction score
37
Location
Arizona
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT PP
You might want to check out this article: https://grassrootsmotorsports.com/articles/are-lighter-wheels-really-better/

It's the only article I've seen where this has actually been empirically tested. Smaller, lighter car, but a decrease in wheel weight of over 25% which is more than we're talking about with Mustangs.

There's definitely a benefit to be had, but as noted, the difference in rubber will make a bigger improvement.
Sponsored

 
 




Top