First 2020 GT500 Dyno Video 705rwhp

obspsd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Posts
2,788
Reaction score
2,050
Location
IL
First Name
Keller
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Auto Ruby Red
Need to see more dyno runs to compare, but Austin’s (Speed Phenom) GT500 certainly put down some impressive numbers. I thought it would be 690+

705 RWHP






Advertisement

 
Last edited by a moderator:

DocGT

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2019
Posts
184
Reaction score
197
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2020 Shadow Black GT500, 2019 Explorer Sport
Need to see more dyno runs to compare, but Austin’s (Speed Phenom) GT500 certainly put down some impressive numbers.
I thought it would be 690+
Impressive. At 10% drivetrain loss that means it makes around 780hp at the crank, at 15% drivetrain loss, it is closer to 830hp at the crank.

I can’t wait for winter to be over!
 
OP
obspsd

obspsd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Posts
2,788
Reaction score
2,050
Location
IL
First Name
Keller
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Auto Ruby Red
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #3
Impressive. At 10% drivetrain loss that means it makes around 780hp at the crank, at 15% drivetrain loss, it is closer to 830hp at the crank.

I can’t wait for winter to be over!
I would guess it is around 10 to 11% drivetrain loss.
 

bluebeastsrt

Oh boy
Joined
May 10, 2015
Posts
6,963
Reaction score
5,900
Location
New Jersey
First Name
BigD
Vehicle(s)
Ruby red 2019 GT Premium.
The trap speed is still saying 660-675ish WHP to me.
 
OP
obspsd

obspsd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2018
Posts
2,788
Reaction score
2,050
Location
IL
First Name
Keller
Vehicle(s)
2017 Mustang GT Auto Ruby Red
  • Thread starter
  • Thread Starter
  • #6
I think it is more likely in the 690 range but I could be wrong.
No matter how you look at it this car will beat almost everything on the street.
Like everything.

Editing to correct spelling.
 
Last edited:

Jmeo

You said member ;)
Joined
May 28, 2014
Posts
6,489
Reaction score
4,336
Location
Massachusetts
First Name
Jaime
Vehicle(s)
2020 GT500
Vehicle Showcase
2
Impressive. At 10% drivetrain loss that means it makes around 780hp at the crank, at 15% drivetrain loss, it is closer to 830hp at the crank.

I can’t wait for winter to be over!
I don't see it (as much as I would like it to be) making more than the Demon, simply because it's lighter (by a little) and slightly slower (for now) so how could it make more? I feel the number is 780-790 crank, based on 10-12% loss. Well, this is my guesstimate anyway.
 
Last edited:

Myshelby3425

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Posts
2,156
Reaction score
511
Location
Miami
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT
I think it is more likely in the 690 range but I could be wrong.
No matter how you look at it this car will beat almost everything on the street.
Like everything.

Editing to correct spelling.
Everything stock in its category for sure!
 

Schwerin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2018
Posts
2,435
Reaction score
1,153
Location
Philly
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang BULLITT
Whats the WTQ?
 

chill66

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2014
Posts
701
Reaction score
574
Location
Reno, NV
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2020 Twister Orange GT500

Schwerin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2018
Posts
2,435
Reaction score
1,153
Location
Philly
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang BULLITT
Apparently that video drops tomorrow. Smart kid splitting it into 2 vids. Lol
It's a dick, clearly for clicks move. There is a reason others don't do it. It points you out as a view pandering asshole.
 

BluByeU

M6G SoCal Cruisers
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Posts
1,389
Reaction score
610
Location
SoCal (Temecula)
First Name
Rob HT
Vehicle(s)
2015 Premium GTPP Recaros & Shaker 401a
Impressive number for sure, wait till some of the popular tuners work their magic!
 

chill66

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 15, 2014
Posts
701
Reaction score
574
Location
Reno, NV
First Name
Chris
Vehicle(s)
2020 Twister Orange GT500
It's a dick, clearly for clicks move. There is a reason others don't do it. It points you out as a view pandering asshole.
Aren’t you pleasant.
 

65Terdlingua

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Posts
297
Reaction score
202
Location
Kansas City
Vehicle(s)
1965 Mustang
They said 705hp on standard. He calculated it to 646 with 15% loss then said SAE was 40 over that. So assuming SAE was 686hp, at a more realistic 10% loss puts it right at 762hp.
 

Advertisement





 
101 - Anderson Composites - 1


Advertisement
Top