Sponsored

ESS G3X lays down 1104whp with a 6rib belt!

Brevin@ESS

Well-Known Member
Gold Sponsor
Joined
Feb 7, 2022
Threads
2
Messages
143
Reaction score
375
Location
Chandler, AZ
Vehicle(s)
17 Mustang GT
Congrats to our customer Shawn and his Gen 3 10r80 mustang!

G3X, 95mm pulley, fore fuel system, Lund tuned.

Still on the factory 6rib rib belt drive!

Stock motor and stock 10r80 transmission

1104whp /802tq

65789CBD-D058-4697-885C-0D0831366B60.jpeg


D4026CDB-8E3F-4DB4-AB95-2AC7F7921778.jpeg


1A6D92B0-9384-4A6D-ABBF-99CC43AEF912.jpeg
Sponsored

 

EgoBoost

9/11 Never Forget
Joined
Jul 23, 2014
Threads
28
Messages
712
Reaction score
853
Location
FL
Vehicle(s)
2024 Black PP GT 6 SPEED
Bruh!
 

Tee-Dots79

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
62
Reaction score
68
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP2
I was just headed here to share Shawn's numbers. Crazy day.
 

Sponsored

Tee-Dots79

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
62
Reaction score
68
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP2
Hi. Great numbers. Just how stock is his Mustang? LTH, TB upgrade, exhaust etc. Thank you.
G3x, Fore level 2 triple pump, catless, MBRP exhaust, E85, some suspension work.
Pretty stock. Nothing done to the motor or trans. Exhaust manifolds are stock.
 

Angrey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Threads
95
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
2,442
Location
Coral Gables
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
So something is definitely exceptional here.

at 17.4 psi that's 118% of atmospheric standard pressure.

At a perfect 100% adiabatic efficiency, that means the motor without the blower was making 505 rwhp.

Does anyone hold the idea that A) that car was making 505 rear wheel horsepower before the blower and B) that adding the blower is perfectly 100% efficient?

Perhaps the pressure reading is off. The other dyno sheet posted was a pound less and 110 rwhp less.

I'm not doubting that the car made 1104, but I'm saying the boost pressure doesn't add up.
 

Tee-Dots79

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
62
Reaction score
68
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP2
So something is definitely exceptional here.

at 17.4 psi that's 118% of atmospheric standard pressure.

At a perfect 100% adiabatic efficiency, that means the motor without the blower was making 505 rwhp.

Does anyone hold the idea that A) that car was making 505 rear wheel horsepower before the blower and B) that adding the blower is perfectly 100% efficient?

Perhaps the pressure reading is off. The other dyno sheet posted was a pound less and 110 rwhp less.

I'm not doubting that the car made 1104, but I'm saying the boost pressure doesn't add up.
I made 509 in my MT82 car w/ catless longtubes, E85, and an airbox. He and I use the same dyno, and typically are there on the same days, so yeah, I think that car makes 505 NA.
 

Sponsored

CORNYOTE

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2019
Threads
13
Messages
526
Reaction score
877
Location
Oklahoma
First Name
Alex
Vehicle(s)
2019 GT
That 10R will be looking for a rebuild with extra clutches soon! 😂
 

Angrey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Threads
95
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
2,442
Location
Coral Gables
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
I made 509 in my MT82 car w/ catless longtubes, E85, and an airbox. He and I use the same dyno, and typically are there on the same days, so yeah, I think that car makes 505 NA.
I'm not saying happy dyno, but that's definitely on the high end. Okay, so now that we're at 505 rwhp, perfet 100% efficiency?

Again, I'm not doubting the car made steam, but at 17.4 psi, it's just not consistent with most other builds that are wilder than this.
 

Tee-Dots79

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
62
Reaction score
68
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP2
I'm not saying happy dyno, but that's definitely on the high end. Okay, so now that we're at 505 rwhp, perfet 100% efficiency?

Again, I'm not doubting the car made steam, but at 17.4 psi, it's just not consistent with most other builds that are wilder than this.
So what do you think is wrong?
 

Angrey

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2020
Threads
95
Messages
2,388
Reaction score
2,442
Location
Coral Gables
Vehicle(s)
2016 GT350
So what do you think is wrong?
Unless it's a completely irresponsible hero pull with way too risky timing and trims, then 17.4 psi isn't enough sauce to get a largely stock coyote to 1104. The sheet says SAE, so one can only assume SAE smoothing 5 (and eliminate the tricks associated with standard corrections). We can only assume the dyno operator isn't fudging using excessive settings for wheel slip or games with the ambient temp sensor.

So basically assuming it's an on the level dyno sheet, that's a TON of power for that boost pressure on a largely stock motor. That's all I'm saying. It's outside the norm.

Again, the OTHER sheet posted only made less than 1000 at 16.4 psi.

Whatever, I have no horse in this. It's all fine.
 

Tee-Dots79

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
62
Reaction score
68
Location
Indiana
Vehicle(s)
2018 GT PP2
Unless it's a completely irresponsible hero pull with way too risky timing and trims, then 17.4 psi isn't enough sauce to get a largely stock coyote to 1104. The sheet says SAE, so one can only assume SAE smoothing 5 (and eliminate the tricks associated with standard corrections). We can only assume the dyno operator isn't fudging using excessive settings for wheel slip or games with the ambient temp sensor.

So basically assuming it's an on the level dyno sheet, that's a TON of power for that boost pressure on a largely stock motor. That's all I'm saying. It's outside the norm.

Again, the OTHER sheet posted only made less than 1000 at 16.4 psi.

Whatever, I have no horse in this. It's all fine.
I can't speak for his tune, of course, but as far as our dyno guy, he reviewed his calibration settings w/ us prior to our pulls today. Nothing seemed out of the ordinary.
Sponsored

 
 




Top