It is. You would need both a new air filter tube and the tube that goes to the intercooler from the outlet of the headunit to go from a g2 to g3 but you do use the same air filter either way
Looks like it topped out at 14psi or 195 kpa. Barometric pressure was 14.1. Converting 195 kpa to psi is 28.2 minus barometric pressure gives us a boost of 14.1. My tuner did not log through the boost pid for some reason. It did seem to flatten out a bit after 7200 like someone else mentioned. The other belt I have doesn't fit like no way is it possible. I'm not sure if it could be belt slip I'll do some more logging on my own.
Which manifold are you running? Stock 18+?Looks like it topped out at 14psi or 195 kpa. Barometric pressure was 14.1. Converting 195 kpa to psi is 28.2 minus barometric pressure gives us a boost of 14.1. My tuner did not log through the boost pid for some reason. It did seem to flatten out a bit after 7200 like someone else mentioned. The other belt I have doesn't fit like no way is it possible. I'm not sure if it could be belt slip I'll do some more logging on my own.
As far as fuel pressure I wanted him to log the low side but he only did the rail pressure itself but as you can see it held pressure well.
Stock 2020 with imrcs.
That's making some steam for sure! Is that the 105mm or the 100mm?Looks like it topped out at 14psi or 195 kpa. Barometric pressure was 14.1. Converting 195 kpa to psi is 28.2 minus barometric pressure gives us a boost of 14.1. My tuner did not log through the boost pid for some reason. It did seem to flatten out a bit after 7200 like someone else mentioned. The other belt I have doesn't fit like no way is it possible. I'm not sure if it could be belt slip I'll do some more logging on my own.
As far as fuel pressure I wanted him to log the low side but he only did the rail pressure itself but as you can see it held pressure well.
I anxious to see Brad's results with the larger air filter, he might pick up a pound of boost.
E85 pumps are quite a bit further from me and since these pumps are in Phoenix they are anywhere from $1 to $1.5 more a gallon than the E50 I can get in Casa Grande. We do not have 93 so just 91.
]Can’t go off of rail fuel pressure as mine held exactly what it needed but look at my fuel lift pump pressure. This was on straight e85 and 120mm pulley. Definitely need to log the fuel lift pump pressure.
As far as fuel pressure I wanted him to log the low side but he only did the rail pressure itself but as you can see it held pressure well.
You Are requesting quite a lot more fuel than me due to the e85. I'm at 530 lb/h. Rail pressure seems to be what he goes off but I get what you're saying.]
[/QUOTE]
Looks like it topped out at 14psi or 195 kpa. Barometric pressure was 14.1. Converting 195 kpa to psi is 28.2 minus barometric pressure gives us a boost of 14.1. My tuner did not log through the boost pid for some reason. It did seem to flatten out a bit after 7200 like someone else mentioned. The other belt I have doesn't fit like no way is it possible. I'm not sure if it could be belt slip I'll do some more logging on my own.
As far as fuel pressure I wanted him to log the low side but he only did the rail pressure itself but as you can see it held pressure well.
Yep I know what you mean about the MAF. I have done plenty of logs while driving where I have maxed out the MAF at 86.69 on the 105mm pulley. Only the 2nd 105mm run made 86.69 and that was the 839 hp number. The other 2 100m runs didnt max the maf out but made more power still. Something else is at play.
