I dont suppose you saw where i posted my boundary opg was marked 2 teeth incorrectly did ya? Glad i caught it. Can't believe the lack of quality control they have if i could tell it was 11 teeth from the keyway instead of 13 and they couldnt. Smh
Link to that post? Id like to check it out.
Gimme a minute, its been a minute. Here are some pics though. My green mark is where i marked it to match my stock crank sprocket. As a headnote, my car was out of time, as shown by logs, when using the boundary marks. After i marked it myself and tested, everything was perfect. All timing procedures were followed per the manual, and the other colored link is on the corresponding mark, but for simplicity here are 2 photos showing the marks on the cs. Ill try to link where i posted it shortly.
till it isn't. That's the funny thing about failure.
IMO, there's too many variances with the aftermarket OPG's as far as actual quality, metals used and actual tolerances. ANYONE with CNC equipment can copy a design and pop it off to sell to the masses... but everyone has to ask, how was that part tested, what failed during testing and what was done to resolve ANY failure either during testing OR what is being reported back from consumers with failed parts? What is their part composition and is it REALLY "as advertised"?
So after nearly 2 years of racing under the car's belt at this point, including doing 2 years of endurance drag and drive in Rocky Mountain Race Week totaling over 3k miles alone for that event, no noise and all is well. Car still sounds just like it did when it was new/stock, engine is beautifully quiet.