Sponsored

Bilstein B6, thinking about running them on stock springs... what do you think?

Mach VII

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Threads
13
Messages
793
Reaction score
1,961
Location
Berkshire Hills, MA
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT 401A, 1989 Lincoln Mk VII LSC
Hi all, I am considering buying a set of Bilsteins and was wondering what advantage there is to lowering springs other than looks. I will not be racing and am looking for a more controlled feel than I have stock. 2019 GT non-PP on 19x10 wheels and 285/35/19 Conti ECS's. I have added the front bracing from the PP cars (STB, lower brace, upper brace) Thanks in advance!
Sponsored

 

Zelek

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Threads
101
Messages
4,773
Reaction score
4,649
Location
Round Rock / Hutto, TX
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
2021 Mustang Mach 1
The spring rates don't match up with the B6's. You need something stiffer. I went with the BMR handling springs on my B6's and they are amazing. That setup will do exactly what you're looking for.

The ride stiffens up a bit but you'll notice you don't get much roll into any corners. The car is more planted and you can take corners more aggressively. By no means is this uncomfortable on the street at all. I absolutely love this setup.
 
OP
OP
Mach VII

Mach VII

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2017
Threads
13
Messages
793
Reaction score
1,961
Location
Berkshire Hills, MA
First Name
John
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT 401A, 1989 Lincoln Mk VII LSC
The spring rates don't match up with the B6's. You need something stiffer. I went with the BMR handling springs on my B6's and they are amazing. That setup will do exactly what you're looking for.

The ride stiffens up a bit but you'll notice you don't get much roll into any corners. The car is more planted and you can take corners more aggressively. By no means is this uncomfortable on the street at all. I absolutely love this setup.
Thanks for the reply. If I were to go to lowering springs I believe either BMR or Steeda minimum drop were the ones I was considering... more towards the Steeda.
 

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
103
Messages
10,481
Reaction score
8,668
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,
I had them on stock springs. They match up well.
 

Sponsored

K4fxd

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2020
Threads
103
Messages
10,481
Reaction score
8,668
Location
NKY
First Name
Dan
Vehicle(s)
2017 gt, 2002 FXDWG, 2008 C6,

Järn

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2015
Threads
20
Messages
243
Reaction score
387
Location
The Motor City
First Name
Tony
Vehicle(s)
2019 Mustang GT Premium, Ruby Red, A10, B&O, AE
@Mach VII John, you asked: " what advantage there is to lowering springs other than looks?"
Simple answer: Ride Frequency.

ModelFront SpringRear SpringAverage Ride Frequency
Non-PP1606681.36
PP11657281.40
PP21988221.51
GT350 (2016-18)1949141.53
GT350 (2019+)2118571.53
GT350R2409141.63


A few more details on spring rates and ride frequency here
A very detailed discussion of ride frequency here:

The Steeda Minimum Drop Springs at 200/800 will give a ride frequency very close to the PP2 when matched with the appropriate dampers (both compression and rebound rates).

Note: I am not a mechanical engineer, and there is much more than spring rate and dampers to the performance/ride of the PP2 (ie wheels/tires...)
Sponsored

 
 




Top