Hack
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2014
- Threads
- 83
- Messages
- 12,311
- Reaction score
- 7,480
- Location
- Minneapolis
- Vehicle(s)
- Mustang, Camaro
Let me help you to understand. It's relatively simple if you think about it. Try to follow along.Well I've heard it all now. The "he's so smart he sounds stupid" defense.
Nice one Centurian, like it, like it.
IQ tests are typically administered with questions in written form that the person being examined will answer by thinking and then writing. Yes, the people who came up with IQ tests seem to have a somewhat poor understanding of the complexity of human intelligence. There are no mechanical puzzles where the person being examined has to disassemble/repair/reassemble something. There are no verbal puzzles where the person has to make a snappy comeback in a split second. There are no ethical or emotional intelligence tests either. Obviously being witty verbally and being able to fix almost anything require high brain power, but those are among the many things that are completely ignored by a traditional IQ test.
Most people in the world are aware that many of these areas of intellect can be independent of each other. For instance, someone can be a genius with hands on work or with speaking but have difficulty reading and understanding the written word. So - after this explanation - do you start to understand what is being explained to you?
If someone were really trying to measure human intelligence accurately and thoroughly, they would obviously not try to use a single number. The way to do it is to form a number of categories and score each one. IMO I would do poorly in any measure of spoken intelligence, but using the written word I think I do ok - and a well-designed IQ test should really differentiate between the two.
But we don't live in that world. So right now when you see an IQ score for someone it should be obvious to you what things are measured and what things are not.
Does that help you to understand?
Sponsored