TicTocTach
Well-Known Member
- Thread starter
- #1
I haven't done any datalogging with my car - I don't think I have any way to do that with the tools I have, and have purposely kept the mechanicals as close to stock as I can to keep reliability close to factory levels. I do have the FP tune though, and have recently been keeping an eye on A:F ratios that display through the dash. I think what I'm seeing is normal for this platform, but not what I expected to see - so I'm here for a reality check.
What I'm seeing is that for most part-throttle situations, AFR's are staying in the 14-13:1 range, even with some boost building. However, actual WOT is showing closer to 10.5-11:1, which IS what I expect to see. It's the part throttle, light boost (5-10 psi) 13's that are throwing me off. I expected to see richer AFR's than 13:1, but that may just be how the Eco 2.3 runs. Cylinder head design, quench/squish, DI fuel management - all those things have greatly improved over the years and I'm assuming that Ford is taking as much advantage of that as they can.
So, enlighten me. Am I seeing AFR's that are reasonable for these scenarios, or do I need to do some detailed datalogging to see if there is a problem going on?
What I'm seeing is that for most part-throttle situations, AFR's are staying in the 14-13:1 range, even with some boost building. However, actual WOT is showing closer to 10.5-11:1, which IS what I expect to see. It's the part throttle, light boost (5-10 psi) 13's that are throwing me off. I expected to see richer AFR's than 13:1, but that may just be how the Eco 2.3 runs. Cylinder head design, quench/squish, DI fuel management - all those things have greatly improved over the years and I'm assuming that Ford is taking as much advantage of that as they can.
So, enlighten me. Am I seeing AFR's that are reasonable for these scenarios, or do I need to do some detailed datalogging to see if there is a problem going on?
Sponsored