Love that South African scenery and road. Great review; A10 guy who does not apologizes for it, unlike most of the reviewers.
Yet another reviewer who comments on how much fun the Mach is... not to beat a dead horse but I find it interesting that so many reviewers choose to use that term to describe it.
I SO miss those days...funny stuff. You can't be funny anymore. It's not allowed.Also, he sounds a lot like Arnold Schwarzenegger. Or Hans and Franz. (Google it kids.)
I don’t know where he got that Europeans prefer automatics at this price point. Also, the Mach 1 was never supposed to be a replacement for the Shelby 350. And for all his feelings about the A10, he did not say anything bad about itThis is not exactly a review, and the overall tone seems a bit negative, but when reading the analysis of the car itself, it's all pretty positive. Even about the A10, even though, like many, the recommendation is for the Tremec manual. I was particularly surprised by the comments about Europeans expecting an auto at this price point. Does anyone know if that is true? I was under the impression that Europeans were more focused on the manuals than those in the US.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/ent...-gt350/ar-AAPnIxW?ocid=mailsignout&li=BBnbfcL
I know that Ford didn't really intend the Mach 1 to be a GT350 replacement, but I've seen several articles that say it is by default, since it sort of fills the space between the GTs and the GT500, so he's not alone in that feeling, fair or not.I don’t know where he got that Europeans prefer automatics at this price point. Also, the Mach 1 was never supposed to be a replacement for the Shelby 350. And for all his feelings about the A10, he did not say anything bad about it
The article speaks about foreign markets which I understand is anything outside the US (i.e. South America, Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, even Canada).I was particularly surprised by the comments about Europeans expecting an auto at this price point. Does anyone know if that is true? I was under the impression that Europeans were more focused on the manuals than those in the US.
Is this guy writing a car review or auditioning as a screen writer for a daytime soap opera? What an overly dramatic bunch of word salad. I found this line very telling of where he’s coming from though……..This is not exactly a review, and the overall tone seems a bit negative, but when reading the analysis of the car itself, it's all pretty positive. Even about the A10, even though, like many, the recommendation is for the Tremec manual. I was particularly surprised by the comments about Europeans expecting an auto at this price point. Does anyone know if that is true? I was under the impression that Europeans were more focused on the manuals than those in the US.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/autos/ent...-gt350/ar-AAPnIxW?ocid=mailsignout&li=BBnbfcL
From what I noticed in discussions, the sentiment between Mustang owners here is that automatics is the preferred version. And dealers know it from their sales, only 30% of ordered Mach 1's by dealers had manual, even despite Tremec.I was under the impression that Europeans were more focused on the manuals than those in the US.
Majority of sold BMWs, Audis, Mercedes above 40k euros (that's their starting point anyway) are automatics. People use them for daily driving and that's why they get them. Really a pleasure in every rush hour traffic jam. Not something most would use Mustang for here.I don’t know where he got that Europeans prefer automatics at this price point.
I think they were always more popular here simply because they were cheaper. Half of Europe was under iron curtain of communism where every piece of luxury was simply not available. Now the convenience factor is kicking in strongly for many people who can afford it, and the used cars get further to more people.And I always thought that manuals were more popular in Europe than the US
In Australia I think the take rate for the auto is near 50% (40 something percent?). It's a no cost option. There are only 700 coming to Aus, and I guess they would have sold them all if it were only manual (they sold all 700 Bullitts) but it certainly appears to have widened the appeal by offering the auto.I don’t know where he got that Europeans prefer automatics at this price point. Also, the Mach 1 was never supposed to be a replacement for the Shelby 350. And for all his feelings about the A10, he did not say anything bad about it
The ONLY reason I'm interested at all in the Mach 1 is because you can get an auto....As far as his whining about the auto, the Mach 1 with the a10 is a better performing car. How is that something to complain about? Not everyone wants a clutch pedal. One of the great things about this car is you can get any version of it with either trans.
I believe it is the herd mentality among the younger reviewers. Just hate when they say “the automatic is a great transmission…but you should get the manual.” And then they don’t explain why.The ONLY reason I'm interested at all in the Mach 1 is because you can get an auto....
Maybe.I believe it is the herd mentality among the younger reviewers. Just hate when they say “the automatic is a great transmission…but you should get the manual.” And then they don’t explain why.