mustang_guy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2015
- Threads
- 12
- Messages
- 5,721
- Reaction score
- 1,324
- Location
- United States
- Vehicle(s)
- it has an engine!
im aware of what it states ive read it before. But it also states the 5.8 is its own new motor. Stop cherry picking.Thanks, the article you linked to states that the Coyote was essentially a clean sheet of paper whereas the the 5.8 was just an extension of pre-existing engine tech...which means, as I stated, the Coyote is a newer tech motor...not sure how you don't comprehend that...oh yeah...your reading comprehension is subpar...here's the excerpt:
Compared to the now familiar Coyote 5.0, which was essentially a clean-sheet-of-paper design that owed next to nothing to the previous 4.6 Three-Valve starting point, it's tempting to say the 5.8 is a stretched 5.4 with the boost turned up. In fact, when described in overview, the 5.8 is indistinguishable from the 5.4 starting point. Like the 5.4, the 5.8 is an all-aluminum V-8 with double overhead camshafts, four valves per cylinder, a belt-driven supercharger, and air-to-water charge cooling. Like the 5.4, the 5.8 does not use variable cam timing, much less twin independent cam timing, nor does it use direct fuel injection. Indeed, the 5.8 does use the same fundamental architecture of the 5.4, meaning basics such as the bore spacing, nominal deck height, pan rail width, cylinder head design, and so on, are identical.
However, scratch just below the surface of the basic architecture and an amazing number of details differ. It's those details that make up this story, and they are there to support four major changes: greater displacement, significantly higher boost, piston oil squirters, and higher rpm.
Point is technologically speaking, it was not new like the Coyote motor was at the time.
No, clearly you didn't get the idea since you told me to go research Griggs
I'd venture to guess that most Mustang owners would classify your scenario as an extreme one.
I know you couldn't care less because you don't even understand the concept...I'm not talking about resale value genius...Feel free to google the Law of diminishing marginal gain...in this context it means that with each dollar you spend you will see less return for it. It's a pretty basic principal of the universe, but clearly you're unable to apply it to automotive.
So now you're lowering your HP number to sound more in line with normality...Shelby's handle 600+ beautifully.
Okay, so once again, next time you're at an event, let the Shelby owners know that their car is a piece of crap, and be sure to use that specific phrasing you recklessly threw around here. Be sure to report back here on their reaction.
Your points that you know more than me about the GT500 have been supported by the following:
1. Saying I have zero experience with them (which is false)
2. Speculating that you know more GT500 owners than I do (which probably isn't true and in any case proves nothing)
Your points that the GT500 is "a piece of crap" have been supported by the following:
1. A single perspective of an extreme case scenario in which the Coyote costs less to obtain a certain HP level beyond what 99% of owners will do
2. The OEM rods break at around 800whp
In any case, you sold a 2014 Shelby for a Mustang GT...no punchline needed...
:headbonk:
I told you to research it yes. I understand. So because I didn't read your whole mod list im suddenly wrong that griggs racing mustangs destroy modded to piss vettes? Oh okay. Why do I need to tell them again I think the car is crap? It is crap for what they charge. Again last time I said it not many of them disagreed with my thoughts on the car. As so have some others here that have owned them and, would you look at that sold it for a s550! Im not lowering anything, high performance cars are coming with more and more power. The fact they thought those rods were good enough is ridiculous. They should have been an all new rod. You've yet to acknowledge that or admit it. You must not read my entire posts. Ill say it ONE last time for you. We all were onto talking about the 5.8 gt500s. I had just made a post about it. You made your post, not knowing you were talking about the 5.4s, I said you don't know anything about gt500s. gt500s being the 5.8s because that's what was being discussed, not gt500s as a whole. You assumed I meant as a whole. I said that I apologize I thought you were talking about 5.8s like the rest of us. But you clearly don't know much about the 5.8s. Ive apologized twice now. I wont do it again. it does prove nothing, but id still be willing to wager a lot of money that I do know more of them. Yup I sold it to order a 2016, shortly. I sure did. Quite a few others have sold it for the s550. If that doesn't tell you something, you're delusional. I get it, youre a gt500 fanboy. Im really done doing this with you though, you keep saying that same stuff, I keep telling you the same stuff back, rinse & repeat. For whatever reason you cant move onto any other points about how mighty the gt500 is. You'll just repeat the same stuff and chose to ignore my info and argue the same petty points. Yeah im done with that. :lol:If you still need to argue, just reread my posts and argue with yourself. But have a good weekend though. No sarcasm there.However, scratch just below the surface of the basic architecture and an amazing number of details differ. It's those details that make up this story, and they are there to support four major changes: greater displacement, significantly higher boost, piston oil squirters, and higher rpm.
So the 5.8 is it's own engine. Few components interchange between a 5.8 and a 5.4. However, even if they physically bolt on, the power of the 5.8 is in a different league than the 5.4. As a quick measure of that, the Condor 5.4 runs 9 pounds of supercharger boost; the Trinity 5.8 runs 15 pounds.
Sponsored