GT500TT
Well-Known Member
It will happen! Stay tuned!Come on someone go find a leaked photo and post it!!!
Sponsored
It will happen! Stay tuned!Come on someone go find a leaked photo and post it!!!
I don't see a peep about it.Meanwhile at Camaro6.............
So nobody but me noticed that the color on the "5.2 L" doesn't match the color of the rest of the casing? Or that the top of the "L" isn't lined up with the top of the "5" ???
Looks Photoshopped to me... addle:
It’s not the final produt so why woul Ford focus on the lettering?
765 HP?too much plumbing to make it rear plus a lot of heat and everything in the back. I’m 98% sure it’s right under the pully and to the right slightly. You can see it in the grey area there, just under.
If it isn’t I’ll cut a portion of my testies off and ship it to forum members. ;). J/k
There is a reason they left out that portion...could be something cool there... hmmm..
A toothed belt... maybe we will see that portion next week.
The Easter egg shot off the dash says 11218, so maybe this thing is shown 1/12/18?
I think it is because the metal is smoothed at the lettering and the rest of the casing is "textured" therefor giving it a different coloring when the flash from the phone, or whatever was used to take the picture, hits the metal.
So nobody but me noticed that the color on the "5.2 L" doesn't match the color of the rest of the casing? Or that the top of the "L" isn't lined up with the top of the "5" ???
Looks Photoshopped to me... addle:
You mean 755? 7th gear 55MPH.765 HP?
Maybe, I stayed on the left and took 65 from RPMs.You mean 755? 7th gear 55MPH.
They don't have to rate crank. They could be like what Honda has been doing. Their new cars make at the wheels almost what their advertised rating is.I think that 755 would be a low number. Just from what Bmac hints.
289 was one of the original engines?Well we can guess that:
it's a 10spd auto
maybe a reference to 755hp.
1-12-18 is the announcement
1964.5 - First year mustang obviously
Any ideas why it is referencing the 289? 11:17:11? or 22.1?
Just not sure why they would reference it on this car.289 was one of the original engines?