Sponsored

3:73 in the 2018

HeavyMetalMonk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2017
Threads
15
Messages
395
Reaction score
94
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
Oxford White 2018 GT Premium PP/MR
So I mentioned in another thread that my 2018 order from Dec 5th hasn't gone anywhere. However there's a MT car with the same specs available, and I'm considering it.
This car has 3:73 gears. Tell me a little bit about the pros and cons (besides the obvious, I know it means quick take offs in 1st and "short legs" and minimal reduction in MPG).
I may do some auto cross in this car, but not super seriously.

Anything important I need to consider?
Sponsored

 

Omega

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 1, 2016
Threads
29
Messages
410
Reaction score
135
Location
Ohio
Vehicle(s)
2017 LB GT PP 401A, Roush 727
Not really anything to add... unless you are going to install a power-adder. then other ratios are better. I have 3.73s and 727 Roush SC. 1st gear is instant redline. pretty useless unless you are just granny driving.

I have seriously considered a rearend swap, just haven't 100% committed to it yet.
 

blitzburgh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2014
Threads
6
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
715
Location
Socal
Vehicle(s)
2021 BMW M2C
I would think first would be useless and that might get annoying.
 
OP
OP
HeavyMetalMonk

HeavyMetalMonk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2017
Threads
15
Messages
395
Reaction score
94
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
Oxford White 2018 GT Premium PP/MR
Someday I may add a SC, but not any time soon and I have no problem swapping gears at that point should I do it.
 

entaiiie

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2017
Threads
4
Messages
119
Reaction score
135
Location
WA
Vehicle(s)
18' GT
3.73s feel really right on the 18s. I had them on my 2012 GT and felt like 1st gear was too short and worthless, but on the new configuration, it's still tall gearing that you wind out a bit, and the power delivery is bang on. I was reluctant but am really happy that I have them. I was originally looking at getting a non PP car with 3.55s instead due to my prior experience with the 3.73s.
 

Sponsored

BmacIL

Enginerd
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Threads
69
Messages
15,010
Reaction score
8,921
Location
Naperville, IL
Vehicle(s)
2015 Guard GT Base, M/T
Vehicle Showcase
1
With the '18 MT82 ratios, I would consider the 3.73s a necessary thing. With the older ratios, it's a tad short and 3.55 is kind of the sweet spot. I have 3.31 and even there it's still pretty short gearing overall.
 

PoppinJ

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2017
Threads
16
Messages
289
Reaction score
77
Location
USA
Vehicle(s)
2018 Mustang GT Premium
With the '18 MT82 ratios, I would consider the 3.73s a necessary thing. With the older ratios, it's a tad short and 3.55 is kind of the sweet spot. I have 3.31 and even there it's still pretty short gearing overall.
What he said. The 2018 gearbox is different than previous years. Gears 5 and 6 are overdrive gears if Im not mistaken, which really only gives you your first four. Even so, my 2018 PP1 with 3.73 has caught me by surprise and bounced me off the rev limiter in first gear, even with the slightly higher redline.
 
OP
OP
HeavyMetalMonk

HeavyMetalMonk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2017
Threads
15
Messages
395
Reaction score
94
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
Oxford White 2018 GT Premium PP/MR
Thanks guys! I'm going to go drive it now and make up my mind on an in stock MT or Auto missing a couple features I sorta wanted.
 

Nomadic

King of Europe
Joined
Oct 11, 2015
Threads
35
Messages
1,152
Reaction score
478
Location
Stay classy San Diego
Vehicle(s)
Current: '19 Mustang GT base 6spd (SOLD),'19 Camaro 1SS A10, '14 VW Jetta SE 1.8
I have 3.73s on my '17.
PROS: everything
Cons: Nothing

Yes, 1st is short. But no big deal. Rather have a short 1st gear than a long 1st gear. With 3.73s you're always in the powerband for the most part. I"m supercharged as well and still love it.
 

Sponsored

wireeater

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2016
Threads
39
Messages
2,914
Reaction score
2,129
Location
Virginia
Website
wheelwell.com
First Name
Rich
Vehicle(s)
Shadow Black 2019 Mustang GT Premium+ PP 6spd
I think for a N/A car they are perfect. I doubt I'd enjoy my car as much if it didn't have the 3.73. They help lay you back into the seat which is probably why I felt like mine was faster than the A10 18' I test drove.
 

NightParade

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2016
Threads
13
Messages
384
Reaction score
514
Location
Houston
First Name
Justin
Vehicle(s)
Magnetic 2017 GT PP
Vehicle Showcase
1
I'd say 3.73 is a must for manual 2018 cars with the taller geared transmission ratios. I think you'll like it, who drives in 1st gear anyways? About to install 3.91 in my 2017 :^)
 
OP
OP
HeavyMetalMonk

HeavyMetalMonk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2017
Threads
15
Messages
395
Reaction score
94
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
Oxford White 2018 GT Premium PP/MR
Car will be here tomorrow :D
 
OP
OP
HeavyMetalMonk

HeavyMetalMonk

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2017
Threads
15
Messages
395
Reaction score
94
Location
CA
Vehicle(s)
Oxford White 2018 GT Premium PP/MR
Any one ever do a 4.10 or 3.90 swap? [MENTION=32734]HeavyMetalMonk[/MENTION] I hope you brought your check book I bet you'll be buying today lol.
You would have won that bet (or close enough) :headbang:

I test drove a pretty entry level GT with the MT. It was nice enough it sold me on the 6 speed. The loaded GT Premium is getting shipped in from another dealer tomorrow.
Next up:
Window tinting and racing stripes.
 
 




Top