airfuel
Well-Known Member
Yeah, when they crank that assembly line to twice normal speed, the workers will definitely not have time to set those panels correctly! Half the screws will also be missing!:lol::ford:
Sponsored
Ok how about later than other models previous release dates... is that better?Are they delayed or are they going to rush them out? I think people are making way too much out of the tentative dates. Unless Ford had issued one release date and then changed it then nothing is delayed. It's just later than we would prefer.
Such a funny little guy.Yeah, when they crank that assembly line to twice normal speed, the workers will definitely not have time to set those panels correctly! Half the screws will also be missing!:lol::ford:
I just think it's funny that going back to the "old" standard of new model year being released in the fall is now "late". Next model years kept creeping earlier and earlier until it was almost a joke. So this is a little reset, and not a huge one. Unless somebody has some insider knowledge that this was not the original date, or there was some sort of problem that forced a slide to the right I don't think there is much value in speculating about a deeper meaning. The exact date could be due to numerous variables and could have been set in stone years ago. We just don't know, so I think it is unreasonable to characterize it as "late" or rushed or anything else. Don't get me wrong, it might be, but that's pure speculation.Ok how about later than other models previous release dates... is that better?
Could mean some generous incentives.Looking at my local dealer who has 32 mustangs sitting on their lot, I would guess they have quite a bit of 17s that need to be moved before crapping on their shoes. Just my guess though.
:doh:If the 2018 comes in at 475 HP and if Ford did not upgrade the internals, specially the rods and pistons, this could be the cause of the delay. The weak link to the 5.0 is the rods, so if anyone plans on adding a hair dryer I highly recommend upgrading the internals
:headbonk:Thats the same thing people said when the S197 and S550 was released !! It's always the same thing thats said when a nextgen vehicle or refresh is revealed, car after car after car. It's hilarious!! I wonder what people will say when the S650 is revealed? hahahahah :lol:
What a helpful and well-thought out post...Consumer reports is another sh!t magazine :lol:
I respectfully disagree. I feel just the opposite - the more I see the '18 the more I like it. It's hard to imagine that a few of the design aspects of one part of the car would get you to abandon it. You must not like to car very much to begin with considering, as you pointed out, that there are dozens of changes that make the '18 a better overall car.I keep coming back to look at the 2018 hoping my eyes/tastes have changed, but it's not happening. It's just an ugly front end. I've really enjoyed my 2015 so far, it's disappointing that the 2018 is completely off the table considering every other change they made are changes I wanted them to make. Oh well. 10 more months of my GT then on to something else.
The current Coyote is good up to 750 HP. People always modify their cars and if the 2018 comes in at 485 HP, hopefully they upgraded the internals.:doh:
Try again... the engine in the 2018 is all new.
And the current coyote doesn't have the issues you are speaking of. What rod failure are you speaking of... and how does the translate into new engine (2018), from suffering potential rod failure..?
And that's fine. I'm not trying to sway anyone one way or another just giving my opinion.I respectfully disagree. I feel just the opposite - the more I see the '18 the more I like it. It's hard to imagine that a few of the design aspects of one part of the car would get you to abandon it. You must not like to car very much to begin with considering, as you pointed out, that there are dozens of changes that make the '18 a better overall car.
Sorry, but you’re wrong. It’s nothing like that at all. Comparing the car’s front end, the entire focal point of a car’s design, to the softness of a center console or the paint color of a rear panel insert... That’s almost as ridiculous as giving the hot dog vendor at Gillette Stadium as much credit as Tom Brady for winning the Super Bowl last year.It would be like not wanting to buy the current gen just because of the hard center console or Ford's decision to put a body colored insert on the rear diffuser. :shrug:
Come on, who's being ridiculous now? The front is important, but so is the back and the center console. It might be more like giving the left tackle as much credit as Tom Brady. Maybe not quite as important as the QB, but try winning without one.And that's fine. I'm not trying to sway anyone one way or another just giving my opinion.
Sorry, but you’re wrong. It’s nothing like that at all. Comparing the car’s front end, the entire focal point of a car’s design, to the softness of a center console or the paint color of a rear panel insert... That’s almost as ridiculous as giving the hot dog vendor at Gillette Stadium as much credit as Tom Brady for winning the Super Bowl last year.
After being on this fourm for a while you would be surprised.I respectfully disagree. I feel just the opposite - the more I see the '18 the more I like it. It's hard to imagine that a few of the design aspects of one part of the car would get you to abandon it. You must not like to car very much to begin with considering, as you pointed out, that there are dozens of changes that make the '18 a better overall car.
It would be like not wanting to buy the current gen just because of the hard center console or Ford's decision to put a body colored insert on the rear diffuser. :shrug: