Mustang vs Aston Martin

This is just a comparison of looks
The DB9 is magnificent looking; so is the Mustang. The price difference is $36,000 vs $209,000
The Vantage, the cheap Aston , is advertized as $99,900 but actually costs $125,000. And, dear colleagues, it does not have beauty of the current Mustang

Ok.

This is like one of those spam emails... but its on a forum and not quite full on spam.

I think the Mustang is better looking from the outside, but most DB9 buyers probably wouldn't be caught dead in a Ford product.

aston martin used to be a ford product until the English bought it back and made a success out of it !!

From: Nanna
To: Son
FWD: FWD: FWD: FWD: RE: The shocking truth about Mustang and Astons

OppoLock said:

From: Nanna
To: Son
FWD: FWD: FWD: FWD: RE: The shocking truth about Mustang and Astons

Click to expand...

Thank you for this :lol:

OppoLock said:

From: Nanna
To: Son
FWD: FWD: FWD: FWD: RE: The shocking truth about Mustang and Astons

Click to expand...

lmfao :lol:

I know it may just be me but when I first saw/heard the Vantage V12 and the Vanquish on Top Gear I thought they were the best looking cars I have/will ever see. If money wasn't an option, I would have one of each. :love:

The S550 is a good looking car, but better looking than an Aston? C'mon

Looks, quality, fit, finish and engine goes to Aston Martin. What else is left?

Sasuketr said:

Looks, quality, fit, finish and engine goes to Aston Martin. What else is left?

Click to expand...

Character

I think there's a resemblence between the two.

How about some rear vs. rear pics?



I dedicate this, my 302nd post in honor of all BOSS 302 Mustangs!

Lets combine them... :lol: :first: