Search results

Optimistically, I'll say $52,000. If I'm being realistic, just under $60,000.

Do we have any indication of what time it will be revealed? I'll be at work all day and don't typically have any down time to browse the internet, but for this I can make an exception.

525hp @ 7950RPM $57,995 MSRP

A correctly calibrated Mustang or Dynojet will read similar under similar conditions on the same car. The problem is a lot of places still don't correctly set up their dyno. The big names like COBB will do a good job with it, but Joe down the street with his dyno shop isn't calibrating his setup...

Are people really complaining about $500? You've never modified a car before if you think $500 is a lot of money. For what you get, it's the best bang for buck you'll find...

function over form

I'm more excited to see all the tuners get power out to 6000rpm. the stock maps are pretty poor performance-wise

Glad you guys are sticking up for yourselves here, Travis. Too many companies just roll over to unfounded criticism. It's nice to see you guys backing your own statements and the work you put into it. I won't be in the market for an S550 for a long time, but you guys will be in the back of my...

Tuners are getting great numbers out of these cars, much better than the 1.6 and 2.0 cars

holy. crap. that's absolutely insane... 427ftlb? am I reading that correctly?

Damn. We might easily see 500hp @ the crank with a tune and aftermarket exhaust. Almost makes you wonder why Ford would ever go FPC on the GT350

Mountune, Ford Racing, Livernois, or COBB if I end up getting a '15/'16 car. Mountune and Ford Racing for the warranty. Livernois or Cobb because they have a solid track record. the truck & SHO guys love Livernois and I have yet to see anyone have an issue with them. Tons of people swear by...

Glad I'm not the only one who thought the stock numbers were way too low. Seems like they ran it on 87 in an auto and then tuned with 93. I don't know why tuners do that. It's so transparent.

That's ridiculous.

I still can't believe we're seeing such big gains for just a catback. I'd be holding off until I saw some user reviews, only because it seems too good to be true. I don't by any means think the companies are lying to us since they've proven reliable in the past, but I just want to see it from...

These gains are making it hard for me to decide whether I'll be in the market for a GT or an ecoboost. Both engines seem to be responding extremely well to the most basic bolt-ons

Why is the entire front clip of the car off? Seems like a shady way to dyno test to me unless the baseline was also achieved like that.

That's a good size for a stock intercooler. Should make people modding their 2.3Ts very happy

The fact that he called it a big block makes me not believe a single thing he said.

Skip shift used to be worth +1 mpg on the EPA circuit just like EPAS. I'm pretty sure that's over now, hence why the feature is gone.