Listed on eBay https://www.ebay.com/itm/115978171741?mkcid=16&mkevt=1&mkrid=711-127632-2357-0&ssspo=OY-EEVRVRrO&sssrc=2051273&ssuid=OY-EEVRVRrO&var=&widget_ver=artemis&media=COPY
Set of Signature Forged SV701 Wheels in Shelby GT350/R Specs, color is Brush Bronzed Tinted. Wheel specs are 19x11.5 R et 55 and 19x11R et 22 with 315/30 R Michelin Pilot Sport 4S and 305/30 F Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. May fit other mustang years and models. All wheels are in gorgeous condition...
True lol. I am pretty happy with the low number though, will be good long term for the 2020s value. Especially considering a DH is now over 70k and not nearly as interesting of a car.
Agree, gen2 and warranty coverage are big price drivers right now. It surprises me how many random people ask about “all the engine problems” the GT350 has. Regardless of actual problems the engine reliability is driving prices, especially gen1 cars.
I wonder if they used a thinner glass for weight savings/ being cheap? My car has less than 5k miles and two significant rock chips/cracks. I am very careful about where/what I drive behind as well. For comparison, my Rover has over 100k miles, many across the Sierras in winter being beat by...
There is, actually, a performance difference. Removing the neck-down section increases the CFM. With it removed it has a bit more of a raspy sound, minimal volume change though.
Agree 100%. Conti is by no means a bad tire, but the PS4S and Cup2 both out perform their counterpart. Now, not everyone needs 10/10 performance, so the additional cost may not be of value. I run PS4S and Cup2s on my cars and would not switch.
I have driven both sets, the Michelins are a better tire on every metric and leaps ahead when you push towards the limit. Absolutely not equal performance. Now, if the money is the main issue then only you can decide if the performance loss is worth the savings for your needs. Contis are prob...