Search results

i actually like it. Much better than the '16 which is indistinguishable from the 15 by most people. the rear is improved, and the front way improved.

I cant believe mustang owners have become such douchers. Acting like BMW owners. Never in 18 years of Mustang forums have i seen such butthurt over a new Mustang. It seems it is all from 15-17 GT owners too. The S550 must have brought in a lot of first time Mustang owners. I own a '16 an...

,

Yes. using a 93 tune is risky. not always the tuners fault, the quality of 93 octane you get is very spotty. i only use 93 in my completely stock '16. depending on how crappy the gas is, sometimes i will get spark knock. I have figured out a couple gas stations to avoid. If you get crappy...

:ford:

Stock tires you want to get a little heat in, but not too much. the 102 mph shows the car is capable of hitting low 13s. Is this your only mods? is this on e30 or pump gas?

My manual ecoboost hits 21psi, but only momentarily. How many rpm are you holding WOT too? Mine usually tops out at 10 until it gets close to 5k rpm then hits the peak and starts to drop back off closer to redline. you wont see more then 10psi at 3-4k rpm. should really start to build after...

Its probably the boost pipe rattling around because it came loose. common for them to be loose and pop off on the '15 cars

I don't think this is a physical cam, just a tune to make the idle sound lopey, hence the name "Casper". Like the ghost cam tunes they have for the 5.0

:headbang:

my new 2016 rear bumper is like that from the factory. doesnt fit perfect. only liitle hooks hold it on, with a tiny screw at each tip.

I have put about 5k miles on my '16 Eco. It does make a big difference in the gas. I have only put "93" in it but the quality has varied greatly by station. I can tell when it is not up par, the power really does fall off in the upper revs with crappy gas. The best time i have recorded...