Search results

I just had the guy remote into my PC and he dropped the update and ran everything...My tuner was ready to plug into car after that with no errors.

Hi, I had same issue when I got my tuner....simple fix: Contact SCT directly and they will update your tuner in a few minutes and you're good to go. I actually chatted with someone from SCT and they did everytnig via my PC. http://www.sctflash.com/ Use live chat

LOL! I wanted to say something about that...but your post was perfect. :popcorn:

10K for a plastic body kit and exhaust?. I only see 2 interior changes, a Roush shifter knob and a Roush applique that goes over the 'Mustang Since 1964'. No suspension, wheel/tire, brakes, seating, or power upgrades.

I thought I'd post factory HP/TQ numbers of Mustangs from the past 30 years (86-15) just to show how amazing technology really is and where the EBM sits in the sea of V8s over the years. 1986 SVO 205HP/248TQ 2.3L Inline 4 Turbo 1993 GT 205HP/275TQ 5.0L V8 1993 Cobra 235HP/280TQ 5.0L V8 94-95...

Autoblog summary is very well put: :D "For the first time in a long time, we can recommend, wholeheartedly, that you should buy a Mustang without the V8. It's very, very good. But more than that, it feels like something unique and exciting, rather than merely playing second fiddle to the...

Looking forward to seeing them installed....I'm in the same boat. I cannot stand the sound of any aftermarket exhaust on EBM. Those tips look pretty nice. Hopefully they don't stick out too much.

It sounds like an SRT-4.

Here's the problem with Roush. There is no VIN to distinguish it from a normal Mustang...unlike svt Cobras, Mach 1, GT/CS, Shelby etc. A dealership looks at VIN..oh its 15 EBM premium. Most definitely have to sell privately to a Roush enthusiast to get any reasonable return back. I can't...

No doubt, you'd probably be the only one around in your state to have that. But 40K is a 15 Premium PP GT all day if you know how to negotiate.

Can you elaborate more on this? An article or something of substance to back these claims up? I personally would like to know more, if this is in fact true.

Nice comeback. But the numbers speak for themselves.

Very true.

And you know this because you had the exact same mods and auto EBM on a 1/4 mile track to confirm right. No.

It is a much more aggressive tune and they took out torque management as well. They listened to what ppl wanted from the Track tune and vastly improved on it. Looking forward to V3.

Do tell why not.

Bama is headquartered in PA. Are you seriously trying to tell me it doesn't snow in PA? Holy Sh!t this is ridiculous.

REALLY impressive results from Bama 93 V2 Track tune. This is why I went with Bama :headbang: Bone Stock 93 Octane: 258RWHP/277RWTQ Bone stock with 93 Track tune only: 283RWHP/342RWTQ Mods w/new V2 93 Octane tune: 308RWHP/379RWTQ 7.71 @ 89 MPH in the 1/8th mile 1.59 60' foot time Calculates...

Ya so did Bama on their 93 octane tune months ago on their V1 tune. V2 is out now.

Again..on race gas and most likely very aggressive tune and other mods I suspect So what. Not a 93 octane tune.