I don't use an impact for anything. But I've seen damage-o-plenty to lug nuts, studs, etc from them being impacted into oblivion. And I've had fasteners fail from hand tool use as well.
Looks like the same mount as the Code Red mount which has elements such as the base, finish, and hardware as what Anderson supplies with their wing. My guess would be that these are done by the same company that does Anderson's.
Precision cut flanges, mandrel bent stainless tube, fixtured and tig welded assembly. Latest in thermal management wrap technology/design and installed perfectly. About as far from "ghetto" as possible. Nice hardware there.
I installed the Ford RSD in my 2020 with no issues but he's right, Ford made a subsequent change that complicated the install a bit. Just plug the belts in beneath the RSD and you should be good to go on later GT500's.
To be fair, we are discussing the factory setup and the limitations therein. Changing endplates, major changes to AOA and/or elevation are a bit beyond the scope. Consider dropping your AJH wing down to the elevation the CFTP cars' wing is at and I sense you'd be imposing a major restriction...
The issue with quoting factory data is that if you happen to have/had access to it, you likely can't comment on it publicly. So we are left with third party testing for verification which can be a bit costly. Suffice it to say that the GT4/CFTP airfoil has the potential to be more effective at...
Note that the aero up front is identical whether you have a swing spoiler or the CFTP wing out back. I wouldn't use the term optimized but rather, compromised, as Tom put it.
I'm not sure anyone would want the same GT4 style as the upper portion of the upright would only mount to a GT4 wing. It's a completely different setup at that juncture.