JLT Intake testing

[kilobravo]

Thanks, Steve but my typical mixed up brain meant to say that I wasn't going to tune her. I'm all in for the JLT Intake.

Sponsored

 

[gfcobra04]

ok, i understand what your saying.



intake wont void a warranty,, and youd likely gain 1psi/ 20hp+ and some mpg if you can stay out of the throttle

Stay out of the throttle, yeah right easier said than done!

 

[Speedbump]

The gains Ken shows from just the intake, without a tune are impressive. Now it just comes down to what JLT prices it at.

 

[newmoon]

My only question would be didn't we see significant gains on the dyno with the stock CAI lid removed (can't remember which tuner tested this)? It would have been nice to see stock CAI lid off, then JLT.

 

[VooDoo387R]

The gains Ken shows from just the intake, without a tune are impressive. Now it just comes down to what JLT prices it at.

I'll pay and so we'll everyone else. Sign me up for one in Twister Orange, cause the stock unit looks like crap. Money pit 2.0 begin...

 

[protraxduner]

The gains Ken shows from just the intake, without a tune are impressive. Now it just comes down to what JLT prices it at.

I believe the gains from this video are WITH a tune. Please correct me if i am wrong.

 

[Speedbump]

I believe the gains from this video are WITH a tune. Please correct me if i am wrong.

During the video he says something about not having a tune.

 

[V00D00]

My only question would be didn't we see significant gains on the dyno with the stock CAI lid removed (can't remember which tuner tested this)? It would have been nice to see stock CAI lid off, then JLT.

IIRC, stock , lid on/off made no diffrence, my car at higer boost, it did. it became a restriction and then on PBD orange car, they showed the same gains when going from lid off to modified intake, which was the 1st step in JLT testing

I believe the gains from this video are WITH a tune. Please correct me if i am wrong.

the same gains would be seen across the board

 

[bluebeastsrt]

Interesting video on the subject.

 

[V00D00]

i can say from experience the lid off is better than lid on. they can say what they want, my #s say different lol

 

[AMBJR]

i can say from experience the lid off is better than lid on. they can say what they want, my #s say different lol

Are you basing it off your dyno numbers with the hood open, or drag strip numbers?

 

[V00D00]

Are you basing it off your dyno numbers with the hood open, or drag strip numbers?

All, and 60-130's.
I could tell u lid on restricted boost. After the 2.75 swap, we were still only.seeing 13.5psi, up.from stock 12.5, but lower than expected, spent an hour or 2 diagnosing and thinking it was belt slip.
Lid off, boom 15psi, right where it should be.

Whats more is if hat video is reliable, as they stated a ported blower.. so 131mph from a ported blower? Something doesnt add up

 

[AMBJR]

All, and 60-130's.
I could tell u lid on restricted boost. After the 2.75 swap, we were still only.seeing 13.5psi, up.from stock 12.5, but lower than expected, spent an hour or 2 diagnosing and thinking it was belt slip.
Lid off, boom 15psi, right where it should be.

Whats more is if hat video is reliable, as they stated a ported blower.. so 131mph from a ported blower? Something doesnt add up

I can see it on the dyno!!! (No ram air); But on the drag strip, it didn't make any difference!!! (With ram air)

 

[V00D00]

I can see it on the dyno!!! (No ram air); But on the drag strip, it didn't make any difference!!! (With ram air)

Made a difference on mine.. so theres that

 

[Speedbump]

Has anyone heard any updates on Kens testing or JLTs anticipated MSRP?

Sponsored