Docscurlock
Well-Known Member
I would prefer not to live this way. To me.gov is there to taker care of things that I cannot like keeping terrorists out of our country.Agree with you completely on our independent attitude. I had a Swedish friend tell me a while back that it is more natural to turn to the government in time of need than it is to turn to family--very odd from an American perspective. They went on to explain, however, that they trust the government and their control over it (not its control over them). They also explained that they pay such high taxes so they can get an immediate response when in need. To them, it's like hiring an agent to take care of certain functions.
By all means let me know if there is a mechanism for the fed gov to restrict movement in individual states without the cooperation of the state gov. Movement restriction recommendations were put into place but that did not seem to stop Spring Breakers.As for control and lock down, I disagree. The Second World War and Cold War led to considerably more sensitivities than we have. This is seen through everything from data protection laws, to rights against illegal search, etc. It's natural as Americans to think we are "freer" than anyone else in the world, but that definitely is not the case. Many of the protections, to us as Americans, are absolutely absurd, but they translate to individual rights.
American Motto: Live free or die!What I will say from an American perspective is that in general (and this is VERY general), Europeans follow rules more than we do. They (generally) maintain that good living is attributable to good order.
Sponsored