Performance Pack Spoiler

[CompOrangeFanatic]

Does it use the same holes as the stock blade spoiler?

100% yes

Sponsored

 

[Hivel]

So the unusual & intricate underbelly you call "voids" is strictly cosmetic?
Curious
I'm no Aerodynamics phd but isn't "neutrality" the goal?

The PP1 can be had with out the wing. So, the wing and no wing configurations produce the same rear down force. That’s what neutral means for the PP1.

The PP2, GT350, and GT500 cars all have front splitters that create down force. So, all those cars need wings/spoilers that produce rear down force to balance the car. You can’t opt to delete the wings/spoilers from those cars.

Cheers,

 

[Jetnoise]

The PP1 can be had with out the wing. So, the wing and no wing configurations produce the same rear down force. That’s what neutral means for the PP1.

The PP2, GT350, and GT500 cars all have front splitters that create down force. So, all those cars need wings/spoilers that produce rear down force to balance the car. You can’t opt to delete the wings/spoilers from those cars.

Cheers,

Share your CD numbers with & w/o please

 

[Hivel]

Share your CD numbers with & w/o please

I’ve got no reason to argue with you. I posted the reasoning I used to define neutrality between no wing and the PP1 wing.

But, CD isn’t a measure of downforce. Its simply a figure of merit. Less CD for a given amount of downforce is a more efficient wing/spoiler design.

Cheers,

Sponsored