Sponsored

JRZ RS2 Install - The Good, the Bad and the Ugly.......and finished with all good.

db252

Equinsu Ocha
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Threads
44
Messages
1,474
Reaction score
876
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicle(s)
16 GT Premium/PP/Nav
Sharing my latest endeavor. Back story was I had Ford Racing struts/shocks along with Steeda ultralite springs and was completely happy with that setup for the longest time for street and road course events. However, along with other upgrades like anything, one area becomes weaker when you strengthen another. All other bits of my suspension are upgraded and I'm Whipple supercharged on E85 running a Magnum XL transmission, beefed up clutch, CF driveshaft and GeForce half shafts among a thousand other things. I'm now also switching to a square 19" setup with 305's on all four corners and completely rotatable. My suspension was now too weak to support this setup.

On to coilovers.......because a friend just wouldn't shut up about how his grass was greener with his coilovers. But he was right after I got all this working so it is I who eats crow. You know who you are so stop gloating.

This was the best option and I researched many brands and setups, and as the title states, ended up with the JRZ RS2's. I didn't want remote reservoirs regardless of their benefits but I did want double adjustability and that's what I went after. I also wanted a divorced rear spring setup as my personal opinion that a true coilover in the rear isn't good for our body mount strength capability. Yes some have them and they say they work great and I think that's great but not in my comfort zone. Also wanted something with great street manners as that's 90% of the driving and was highly functional for the other 10% road course time.

JRZ offers quite a few setups from single to three way adjustability, setups with camber plates or ones with the ability to mount to oem upper strut mounts. I bought the RS2 touring model which is a non external reservoir double adjustable made to mount to oem upper strut mount hardware, although I planned on using camber plates of my choice and spring rates included of 500 front and 900 rear.

Anyways, on to the pics and 'issues' with my install.

The parts......

IMG_0712.jpg
IMG_0713.jpg
IMG_0715.jpg
IMG_0716.jpg
IMG_0717.jpg
IMG_0718.jpg
IMG_0719.jpg
IMG_0720.jpg
IMG_0721.jpg
IMG_0722.jpg
IMG_0723.jpg


Hard not to be happy with the visual quality and packaging provided.

The rear install. Other than initial install then wheel on, resting weight, jack up, wheel off, readjust height and repeating this plenty of times to get the overall setting the way you want it, this all went pretty good.

Except, FIRST problem. So, GeForce half shaft boots are in a different configuration than stock half shafts and come incredibly close to the shock body. I'm talking a millimeter of space when I had the Ford racing components on and per specs I received of the JRZ shock body it was going to be slightly larger which would be a major issue. This is also where a true coilover would be a nightmare.

This was the fix. I had to pull my half shafts and send them to Geforce to have outer racing boots installed. This is where they internalize the boot design and they look like this thereby making a huge space available for a larger shock body and yes even a true coilover most likely.

Previous

60004950789__82F44F9B-9B49-45D2-8F3F-E8121CF0A435.jpg



After

IMG_0730.jpg

IMG_0731.jpg


The rears together and you can also see the space now between the shock body and half shaft. Problem solved and rears complete. On a side note, I used to have Steeda upper shock mounts but they won't work with the adjustment setup so I switched to J&M shock mounts which are perfect and still have a bearing to eliminate shock bind as the Steedas did.

IMG_0751.jpg
IMG_0752.jpg


Off to the fronts. With my previous suspension setup I ran MM camber/caster plates and they worked great. They got me to -2.5 for track and I was always fine with that. For the new setup, and being coilovers, I wanted something more appropriate to unite with the coilover design for camber adjustability and I went to Vorshlag plates that matched perfectly to the 2.25 id spring.

IMG_0875.jpg
IMG_0876.jpg


I also decided to add new Steeda end links because my boots were damaged and worn on my earlier after market ones.

IMG_0993.jpg


Now the install. Everything went together as one would expect all the way to full mounting.

IMG_0884.jpg
IMG_0885.jpg
IMG_0894.jpg
IMG_0912.jpg


I also enlarged the strut tower opening to have unrestrictive camber adjustability especially with the rebound knob in play. I used the Vorshlag kit to handle that job. The last pic is of a camber adjustment of -1.8 but I can get to a maximum of -3.0 on both sides without contact of knob to strut tower.

IMG_0701.jpg
IMG_0703.jpg
IMG_0706.jpg
IMG_1036.jpg


Ok now. Both sides installed, same process of adjust height and readjust and readjust and readjust. Finally done and now test drive as one would expect. For reference the settings for compression and rebound were set to street recommendations per JRZ. Go our for a drive and it is all great. Granted, I'm just street driving and finding some corner spots that are local and testing nose dive on hard braking blah blah blah and I'm all smiles. More driving just around the city running errands doing nothing crazy and just getting the initial settle taken care of just to get super excited about readjusting again and all of the oh so done with wheel off and on again required.

Before I progress to the awesome problems I found out with the front, let me make it clear that after all the contact with vendors and their products, all of these problems were a result of my recipe and by that I mean all of my after market parts involved with the front suspension not getting along are completely on me and my lack of checking some movements prior to road testing which still hits my wrenching ego now.

FIRST problem (yes technically the second problem because of the rear install but lets just keep this to the front). My Ford Racing front sway bar has no collars. Don't know why I never noticed it being a problem with my long past setup but it quickly became an issue now. The sway bar, as it is common to happen when no collars are present, walked from side to side but I caught it early. Yes I could have bought collars but I chose to move to a different sway bar that being the Steeda brand which of course had collars and would correct that problem.

You can see the difference after a drive where the bar was heavily favoring the left side and just barely made some contact to the strut. NOT MY NEW STRUT!!

IMG_0830.jpg
IMG_0831.jpg


New sway bar in.

IMG_0869.jpg
IMG_0871.jpg
IMG_0872.jpg


Aaaaaaaaaand all back together for more driving into a parking lot and just light testing turn to turn and all that goes with that. Feels good and back home to check and reevaluate. Again with the fricken tire removal.

Sooooooo, what's going on here?? Right side and left side respectively.

IMG_0933.jpg
IMG_0936.jpg


If you could see my face now. This is why I'm not a good cook. JRZ end link mount is different than most being a large bracket as you can see. Steeda end links and many other brands are completely different than stock end links. New sway bar has multiple mounting points each one changing the geometry of end link alignment and action. Just by looking at the last pic above, the bracket on the JRZ makes contact with the end link giving it nowhere to go other than a yoga pose it's incapable of thereby breaking. Drawing you a mental picture, stock end links have quite a bit of stand off which allows more articulation and JRZ testing was done with stock end links and a stock sway bar allowing only one point of attachment. So the result of my various products produced this end result. NOT MY NEW END LINKS!!

So off to the computer to buy another exact same set of end links with a plan in my head and a talk with Steeda engineers to see if my idea was safe and effective and those results below.

New set of end links in hand and four jam nuts. I added the jam nuts to the studs of the end links to create stand offs that would prevent my mistake from happening again. Steeda was good with what I came up with. Here you can see what the end result was and the action of turning the wheel lock to lock in both directions.

IMG_1002.jpg
IMG_1003.jpg
IMG_1005.jpg
IMG_1006.jpg


Problem(s) solved. No contact from lock to lock and of course there will be more driving with more concentrated testing to see if more arise but as of a couple weeks later, all is fine. Track will be the ultimate test and I'll know more then.

The ride is indescribable how much better it is even with 'street' settings in play. I'm not the one to say how every little thing you add to the car is this amazing change but this falls into that category. Really looking forward to the next road course day and increasing the settings to see what those results are. Also looking forward to the new wheel and tire setup I mentioned earlier to compliment the new suspension.
Anyone going after a quality coilover setup always boasts about the improvement and I'm on that list now. This isn't for everyone but if you really are one to push your car to limits and want to give it the right tools, this is a great way to go. Lots of brands will offer great results and some brands not so great results so do your do diligence if this is a route you're looking into and learn from my mistakes wether its brand based or just a lack of checking appropriate parts working together.

IMG_1040.jpg

This pic with 6GR wheels and Cup2 tires - 20x11 rear with 305/30 and 20x10 front with 285/30
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

rio16

MAD_50HH
Joined
Jan 8, 2015
Threads
98
Messages
2,048
Reaction score
800
Location
Bay Area SJ, CA
First Name
Rio
Vehicle(s)
2015 Mustang GT Whippled Competition Orange
Those look so good Dave. Always a great write up.
 

shogun32

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
14,682
Reaction score
12,216
Location
Northern VA
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
Vehicle Showcase
2
My suspension was now too weak to support this setup.
could you elaborate on that assertion?

Too late now, but anyone have a side-by-side comparison of the end-link mounting distance and angle of bracket on the Ford shocks vs the JRZ? Those angles don't give me any warm and fuzzies. It's almost like it needs an extra hole further down toward the weld.

Also, why do you have a washer under the flanged nut at the bottom end of the end-link?
 
Last edited:
OP
OP

db252

Equinsu Ocha
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Threads
44
Messages
1,474
Reaction score
876
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicle(s)
16 GT Premium/PP/Nav
could you elaborate on that assertion?

Too late now, but anyone have a side-by-side comparison of the end-link mounting distance and angle of bracket on the Ford shocks vs the JRZ? Those angles don't give me any warm and fuzzies. It's almost like it needs an extra hole further down toward the weld.

Also, why do you have a washer under the flanged nut at the bottom end of the end-link?

Sure. My reference to my suspension too weak for my previous setup was specific to on track only. I could have maintained my earlier setup on street forever. Speed, braking, lateral grip, etc. was all hampered by a less than up to the challenge setup. I didn't think it would be such a difference but it has been even with just street driving for now. Not saying anyone or everyone needs to go this route as that just wouldn't be true; this fit my wants/needs.

The Ford struts and JRZ strut end link mounting point is in the correct location as I had both on hand to compare. The bracket design compared to almost any other strut design whether it be coilover or not was almost a standard other than the JRZ with the larger bracket mount. Regardless of brand of sway bar, if one is chosen that has multiple mounting holes for level of stiffness, then the one chosen spot always affects the angle of the end link. As far as adding an 'extra hole' lower on the bracket, you'd need complete custom end links made or you will have the sway bar resting on the subframe no matter how short you set them (that's bad).

I have a washer under the nut as it was provided by Steeda. Do you feel it should not be there?

Unrelated to anything you asked but here is a comparison from a stock end link to a aftermarket end link. You can see the amount of stand off on the stock one compared to any other end link which is why I had to add the jam nut for spacing.

00-ELK013_endlinks2.jpg
 

Sponsored

shogun32

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
14,682
Reaction score
12,216
Location
Northern VA
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
Vehicle Showcase
2
The Ford struts and JRZ strut end link mounting point is in the correct location as I had both on hand to compare.
sure. But almost all other shocks have no bracket below the hole - it's attaches like a sideways 'T' (butts into tube) whereas the JRZ is on a 'L' which means there is a lot metal below the hole whereas all the others have air. JRZ should have designed it as a bent 'L' if they hoped to maintain the same degree of swing clearance directly under the hole.

Do you feel it should not be there?
when dealing with a flanged nut, no.
 
OP
OP

db252

Equinsu Ocha
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Threads
44
Messages
1,474
Reaction score
876
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicle(s)
16 GT Premium/PP/Nav
Completely agree with you on the JRZ design and stated within the post. It's one of the things I'd like them to change but I doubt that's happening and I've had conversations with them about it. If you hooked up a stock sway bar with stock end links there is no issue but that isn't the way of us who mod to improve. This is why I posted it so people are aware if they go this route as it may be something they have to deal with. In the end, this would not be a deal breaker for me as the known quality and history of JRZ is worth it.

I will confer with Steeda about the washer but I'm not in disagreement with you about that either.
 

2morrow

DesignR/DriveR/RiceEatR
Joined
Nov 15, 2015
Threads
51
Messages
5,985
Reaction score
5,347
Location
NorCal Bay Area
First Name
Todd
Vehicle(s)
'16 Mustang GTPP
Great write up Dave! Thanks for pointing out the issues and solutions for those of us on the fence for something like this

I would be very interested to see/ridealong with your new set up on-track.
 

shogun32

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2019
Threads
89
Messages
14,682
Reaction score
12,216
Location
Northern VA
First Name
Matt
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT/PP, '23 GB Mach1, '12 Audi S5 (v8+6mt)
Vehicle Showcase
2
maybe a stupid idea but going off just pics, how about putting the lower end-link on the inside of the sway instead of the outside? Just eyeballing but that bracket looks like it's 3/16" or even more which strikes me as massively over-done esp with all that bracing. Other shocks come with 'sheet metal' brackets.
 

turbofiveoh

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2017
Threads
25
Messages
182
Reaction score
55
Location
EZ Street
Vehicle(s)
Mustang
Nice write up. I'm curious, did this same gloating friend give you a heads up about the axles too so you could get axles adjusted before starting the coilover install?
 

Sponsored
OP
OP

db252

Equinsu Ocha
Joined
Jan 1, 2016
Threads
44
Messages
1,474
Reaction score
876
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicle(s)
16 GT Premium/PP/Nav
Great write up Dave! Thanks for pointing out the issues and solutions for those of us on the fence for something like this

I would be very interested to see/ridealong with your new set up on-track.
Thanks Todd and you know you can drive it whenever yourself and give a self experienced review. We are constantly battling to keep ahead of each other on the track. Lets get out there soon.

maybe a stupid idea but going off just pics, how about putting the lower end-link on the inside of the sway instead of the outside? Just eyeballing but that bracket looks like it's 3/16" or even more which strikes me as massively over-done esp with all that bracing. Other shocks come with 'sheet metal' brackets.
Tried every variation of end link attachment; stud in or out or opposing/same direction...this is the only way and talked with another installed version having to do the same. Yes I know that almost every other setup does it like stock.


Nice write up. I'm curious, did this same gloating friend give you a heads up about the axles too so you could get axles adjusted before starting the coilover install?
You my friend are a complete pain in the ass......go buy a dash!
 

Biggsy

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 3, 2018
Threads
186
Messages
2,238
Reaction score
1,609
Location
MD
First Name
Warren
Vehicle(s)
'17 GT PP, '10 Tundra
I have a washer under the nut as it was provided by Steeda. Do you feel it should not be there?
@shogun32 is right ... I reinstalled my set last month and contacted steeda and can confirm it goes on the endlink side. Without the washer on that side the stud hex eats onto the sway bar. Not the end of the world but also one of the reason for the washer.

Just my 0.02
 

fatbillybob

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Threads
43
Messages
554
Reaction score
270
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT pp1 A10 Orange
What are the JRZ spring rates?
 

fatbillybob

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Threads
43
Messages
554
Reaction score
270
Location
SoCal
Vehicle(s)
'19 GT pp1 A10 Orange
It is interesting that the big shock guys JRZ, MCS, JRi, Penske all seem to run considerably higher rates than all the rest? It makes me feel better about The MCS rates which I am installing Tomorrow.
Sponsored

 
 




Top