Perhaps more important is that since wind is somewhat variable, the other power sources needed to keep power supply relatively constant end up working less efficiently (start-up emission levels typically being higher than at steady-state/fully warmed up). Adding more windmills would exaggerate this issue rather than help solve it.
Every form of energy production will have/has adverse effects. The hope is that we will find the ones that do the least harm.
Agreed what I am trying to show is that we are being mislead, misinformed, lied to and kept in the dark about the other forms of energy production. Pollution isn't being reduced much if any it's just the sources of pollution are being spread around to many more different things. EV's aren't reducing pollution 80 percent of EV pollution comes from making the car 15 percent from charging the EV over it's life time and the other 5 percent are the used up EV batteries.
And they don't work for shit. They are just for publicity. Nuclear is where it's at, but it melts too many snowflakes.
That's one way to look at it. But in order to see the whole picture I would also consider the effects that the European market had on the Mustang itself.
Whether it's 16-17%, or 33%, doesn't matter. If ICE engines are banned in Europe, then Mustangs cannot be sold there.
20 years. And that's just with the current legislation recently proposed. That date may move forward. Hell, they wanted it to be 10 years from now.
Vlad, as you’ve been reading many Americans have a real issue regarding change and evolution. And heaven forbid there’s a chance of taking something from them, regardless if it for the greater good or not.
Fixed that for you, bud!
